电力系统保护与控制
電力繫統保護與控製
전력계통보호여공제
POWER SYSTM PROTECTION AND CONTROL
2013年
22期
122-127
,共6页
配电自动化%分布式馈线自动化%故障判定%故障隔离%故障恢复%可靠性
配電自動化%分佈式饋線自動化%故障判定%故障隔離%故障恢複%可靠性
배전자동화%분포식궤선자동화%고장판정%고장격리%고장회복%가고성
distribution automation%distributed feeder automation%fault location%fault isolation%fault recovery%reliability
为解决分布式馈线自动化故障判定过程中的可靠性问题,提出了配电网开关分组模型,依靠开关分组模型研究了开关拒分情况下的故障处理过程,并给出了一种基于逻辑运算的故障处理原则。对开关一次重合闸原则进行了补充,有效避免了开关拒分情况下的故障隔离范围扩大。对开关拒合情况进行了分析,增加了一种开关拒合情况下的二次重合功能,有效避免了开关拒合情况下的故障隔离范围扩大。分三种情况研究了相邻开关通信故障下的故障处理过程,并给出了一种统一的故障判定方法。对开关保护信号失灵分为互感器偶然性干扰及永久性故障分别进行了分析,研究表明偶然性故障对故障隔离无影响,永久性故障将导致故障隔离范围扩大。给出了实例分析,表明所提方法可行。
為解決分佈式饋線自動化故障判定過程中的可靠性問題,提齣瞭配電網開關分組模型,依靠開關分組模型研究瞭開關拒分情況下的故障處理過程,併給齣瞭一種基于邏輯運算的故障處理原則。對開關一次重閤閘原則進行瞭補充,有效避免瞭開關拒分情況下的故障隔離範圍擴大。對開關拒閤情況進行瞭分析,增加瞭一種開關拒閤情況下的二次重閤功能,有效避免瞭開關拒閤情況下的故障隔離範圍擴大。分三種情況研究瞭相鄰開關通信故障下的故障處理過程,併給齣瞭一種統一的故障判定方法。對開關保護信號失靈分為互感器偶然性榦擾及永久性故障分彆進行瞭分析,研究錶明偶然性故障對故障隔離無影響,永久性故障將導緻故障隔離範圍擴大。給齣瞭實例分析,錶明所提方法可行。
위해결분포식궤선자동화고장판정과정중적가고성문제,제출료배전망개관분조모형,의고개관분조모형연구료개관거분정황하적고장처리과정,병급출료일충기우라집운산적고장처리원칙。대개관일차중합갑원칙진행료보충,유효피면료개관거분정황하적고장격리범위확대。대개관거합정황진행료분석,증가료일충개관거합정황하적이차중합공능,유효피면료개관거합정황하적고장격리범위확대。분삼충정황연구료상린개관통신고장하적고장처리과정,병급출료일충통일적고장판정방법。대개관보호신호실령분위호감기우연성간우급영구성고장분별진행료분석,연구표명우연성고장대고장격리무영향,영구성고장장도치고장격리범위확대。급출료실례분석,표명소제방법가행。
To improve the reliability of distributed feeder automation fault location, a distribution network switch group model is established. Based on switch group model, the failure process due to switch rejecting is researched. The fault handing principles are proposed based on logic operations. By supplementing the principle of single-shot reclosing, the extension of fault isolation scope is avoided effectively when the switch rejects to break. Through analyzing the switch rejecting to close, a secondary reclosing processing method is proposed to avoid fault isolation extending. The fault handling process is researched in three cases of communication failure of the adjacent switch. A uniform failure determination method is given. Incidental interference and permanent failure are discussed in switch protection signal failure. The research shows that incidental interference has no effect on fault isolation, while permanent failure will expand the scope of fault isolation. The results of many cases study show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approaches.