CAJ | 학술논문

科斯的产权不仅存在于私法，还存在于公法当中；不仅仅指人权，还包括物权；有些地方究竟指什么，恐怕连他自己都很难说清楚。后人更是越解析越离谱。其实，产权就是财产所有权的简称，产权与财产所有权的区别是不存在的，存在的只是对财产所有权的误读。财产的所有权较之财产的权利更能够说明各项财产权利的功能和逻辑关系。
과사적산권불부존재우사법，환존재우공법당중；불부부지인권，환포괄물권；유사지방구경지십요，공파련타자기도흔난설청초。후인경시월해석월리보。기실，산권취시재산소유권적간칭，산권여재산소유권적구별시불존재적，존재적지시대재산소유권적오독。재산적소유권교지재산적권리경능구설명각항재산권리적공능화라집관계。
Coase's property rights not only belongs to the private law, also exists in public law; not only refers to the human rights, also including property rights;In some places, what exactly mean, I'm afraid even to himself is hard to say. The analytic of later generations makes it more outrageous. In fact, property right is the abbreviation of property ownership, property right and property ownership distinction does not exist, there exists only the misunderstanding on property ownership. Ownership of the property than the rights of property is more able to illustrate the function and logic relations.