中国医师进修杂志
中國醫師進脩雜誌
중국의사진수잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATES OF MEDICINE
2013年
29期
1-3
,共3页
郑智%郭国俊%潘友民%方泽民%查正彪%徐立%周雁荣%李军%魏翔
鄭智%郭國俊%潘友民%方澤民%查正彪%徐立%週雁榮%李軍%魏翔
정지%곽국준%반우민%방택민%사정표%서립%주안영%리군%위상
诊断%治疗学%自发性孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层
診斷%治療學%自髮性孤立性腸繫膜上動脈夾層
진단%치료학%자발성고립성장계막상동맥협층
Diagnosis%Therapeutics%Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection
目的 探讨自发性孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层(SISMAD)这一罕见疾病的临床特点、诊断、临床分型及治疗策略.方法 回顾性分析12例SISMAD患者的临床资料,根据临床表现将SISMAD分为单纯型和复杂型.结果 12例患者均为单纯型.其中10例行保守治疗,2例行腔内介入治疗.12例患者临床症状均缓解,随访9~140个月,CT血管造影提示肠系膜上动脉夹层未进展,假腔有不同程度减小,未见新血栓发生.结论 对于单纯型SISMAD患者,保守治疗能获得良好的短期和中长期疗效.腔内介入治疗具有创伤小,见效快且效果明显等优势,但远期疗效仍需长期随访.
目的 探討自髮性孤立性腸繫膜上動脈夾層(SISMAD)這一罕見疾病的臨床特點、診斷、臨床分型及治療策略.方法 迴顧性分析12例SISMAD患者的臨床資料,根據臨床錶現將SISMAD分為單純型和複雜型.結果 12例患者均為單純型.其中10例行保守治療,2例行腔內介入治療.12例患者臨床癥狀均緩解,隨訪9~140箇月,CT血管造影提示腸繫膜上動脈夾層未進展,假腔有不同程度減小,未見新血栓髮生.結論 對于單純型SISMAD患者,保守治療能穫得良好的短期和中長期療效.腔內介入治療具有創傷小,見效快且效果明顯等優勢,但遠期療效仍需長期隨訪.
목적 탐토자발성고립성장계막상동맥협층(SISMAD)저일한견질병적림상특점、진단、림상분형급치료책략.방법 회고성분석12례SISMAD환자적림상자료,근거림상표현장SISMAD분위단순형화복잡형.결과 12례환자균위단순형.기중10례행보수치료,2례행강내개입치료.12례환자림상증상균완해,수방9~140개월,CT혈관조영제시장계막상동맥협층미진전,가강유불동정도감소,미견신혈전발생.결론 대우단순형SISMAD환자,보수치료능획득량호적단기화중장기료효.강내개입치료구유창상소,견효쾌차효과명현등우세,단원기료효잉수장기수방.
Objective To discuss the clinical features,diagnosis,classification and treatment strategy of a rare disease,spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD).Methods The clinical data of 12 patients with SISMAD were retrospectively analyzed.Based on the clinical features,SISMAD was classified into the simple type and the complicated type.Results All the patients were defined as the simple type.Among them,10 patients underwent conservative treatment,2 patients were performed with routine interventional therapy.Clinical symptoms were relieved in all cases.Follow-up 9-140 months,computed tomography angiography showed diminished extent of the false lumen without any view of new thrombosis or embolism.No patient showed dissection progression on follow-up angiogram.Conclusions For the simple type,most cases might be successfully treated with conservative treatment,and the short-term and long-term results are good.And endovascular stent placement appears to be an acceptable alternative,however,its long-term result needs further investigation.