医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2013年
25期
178-178,179
,共2页
必兰麻%2％利多卡因%浸润麻醉%急性牙髓炎
必蘭痳%2％利多卡因%浸潤痳醉%急性牙髓炎
필란마%2％리다잡인%침윤마취%급성아수염
Required Lan Ma%2％ lidocaine%anesthesia%acute pulpitis
目的比较必兰麻浸润麻醉与2%利多卡因浸润麻醉法，在上下颌急性牙髓炎患者拔髓中疼痛观察。方法选择上下颌急性牙髓炎患者120名，随机分成二组为、治疗组及对照组，治疗组60例急性牙髓炎患者用必兰麻做浸润麻醉，不分上下颌牙齿；对照组60例急生牙髓炎患者用2%利多卡因做浸润麻醉，不分上下颌牙齿，比较2组的麻醉显效时间、术中疼痛程度，并按t检验法进行医学统计分析。结果治疗组麻醉显效时间、术中疼痛程度明显好于对照组。结论必兰麻浸润麻醉作用于急性牙髓炎比2%利多卡因浸润麻醉作用急性牙髓炎，麻醉起效快、镇痛效果好。
目的比較必蘭痳浸潤痳醉與2%利多卡因浸潤痳醉法，在上下頜急性牙髓炎患者拔髓中疼痛觀察。方法選擇上下頜急性牙髓炎患者120名，隨機分成二組為、治療組及對照組，治療組60例急性牙髓炎患者用必蘭痳做浸潤痳醉，不分上下頜牙齒；對照組60例急生牙髓炎患者用2%利多卡因做浸潤痳醉，不分上下頜牙齒，比較2組的痳醉顯效時間、術中疼痛程度，併按t檢驗法進行醫學統計分析。結果治療組痳醉顯效時間、術中疼痛程度明顯好于對照組。結論必蘭痳浸潤痳醉作用于急性牙髓炎比2%利多卡因浸潤痳醉作用急性牙髓炎，痳醉起效快、鎮痛效果好。
목적비교필란마침윤마취여2%리다잡인침윤마취법，재상하합급성아수염환자발수중동통관찰。방법선택상하합급성아수염환자120명，수궤분성이조위、치료조급대조조，치료조60례급성아수염환자용필란마주침윤마취，불분상하합아치；대조조60례급생아수염환자용2%리다잡인주침윤마취，불분상하합아치，비교2조적마취현효시간、술중동통정도，병안t검험법진행의학통계분석。결과치료조마취현효시간、술중동통정도명현호우대조조。결론필란마침윤마취작용우급성아수염비2%리다잡인침윤마취작용급성아수염，마취기효쾌、진통효과호。
Objective To compare shal Lan Ma with 2% lidocaine infiltration anesthesia infiltration anesthesia in the upper jaw acute pulpitis pain observed in patients with spinal cord pul . Methods Patients with acute pulpitis upper and lower jaws 120, were randomly divided into two groups for the treatment group and the control group, the treatment group, 60 cases of patients with acute pulpitis must blue linen anesthesia, regardless of the teeth on the lower jaw; control group of 60 patients with acute pulpitis were born to do with 2% lidocaine infiltration anesthesia, regardless of the upper and lower teeth, compared two groups of anesthetized effective time, intraoperative pain, according to t-test for medical statistical analysis. Effective in the treatment group anesthesia time, intraoperative pain significantly better than the control group. Conclusion Lan Ma anesthesia must act on acute pulpitis than 2% lidocaine anesthetic effects of acute pulpitis, narcotic analgesic effect.
