医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2013年
25期
49-50
,共2页
心房颤动%胺碘酮%洋地黄类药物%疗效观察
心房顫動%胺碘酮%洋地黃類藥物%療效觀察
심방전동%알전동%양지황류약물%료효관찰
Atrial fibrilation%Amiodarone%Digitalis drugs%Clinical observation of
目的对比研究胺碘酮与洋地黄类药物治疗房颤控制心室率的疗效。方法以2009年10月至2011年10月在本院内科住院110例房颤患者为研究对象,患者随机分成2组,胺碘酮组54例,洋地黄组56例,分别静脉给药胺碘酮和毛花苷C。结果胺碘酮组的总有效率为85.2%(46/54),洋地黄组的总有效率为57.1%(32/56),两组患者的总有效率比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论静脉推注胺碘酮治疗房颤的疗效优于洋地黄类药物,在控制心室率方面也优于洋地黄类药物。
目的對比研究胺碘酮與洋地黃類藥物治療房顫控製心室率的療效。方法以2009年10月至2011年10月在本院內科住院110例房顫患者為研究對象,患者隨機分成2組,胺碘酮組54例,洋地黃組56例,分彆靜脈給藥胺碘酮和毛花苷C。結果胺碘酮組的總有效率為85.2%(46/54),洋地黃組的總有效率為57.1%(32/56),兩組患者的總有效率比較,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論靜脈推註胺碘酮治療房顫的療效優于洋地黃類藥物,在控製心室率方麵也優于洋地黃類藥物。
목적대비연구알전동여양지황류약물치료방전공제심실솔적료효。방법이2009년10월지2011년10월재본원내과주원110례방전환자위연구대상,환자수궤분성2조,알전동조54례,양지황조56례,분별정맥급약알전동화모화감C。결과알전동조적총유효솔위85.2%(46/54),양지황조적총유효솔위57.1%(32/56),량조환자적총유효솔비교,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론정맥추주알전동치료방전적료효우우양지황류약물,재공제심실솔방면야우우양지황류약물。
Objective Comparative Study on efficacy of amiodarone and digitalis drug treatment of atrial fibril ation to control ventricular rate.Methods October 2009 to October 2011, 110 cases of hospitalization of patients with atrial fibril ation in hospital medicine as a research object,The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups,Amiodarone group 54 cases,Digitalis group of 56 cases, Intravenous administration.Results Amiodarone group the total effective rate was 85.2%(46/54),Digitalis group, the total effective rate was 57.1%(32/56),Two groups of patients with total efficiency,Statistical y significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion Intravenous bolus of amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibril ation effective than digitalis drugs,Superior to digitalis drugs in the control of ventricular rate.