中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志
中國骨科臨床與基礎研究雜誌
중국골과림상여기출연구잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND BASIC ORTHO[AEDIC RESEARCH
2013年
2期
79-83
,共5页
缪晓刚%哈巴西·卡肯%赵喜滨%王利%袁宏
繆曉剛%哈巴西·卡肯%趙喜濱%王利%袁宏
무효강%합파서·잡긍%조희빈%왕리%원굉
髋%骨密度%人体质量指数%骨质疏松,绝经后%绝经后期%哈萨克族%女(雌)性
髖%骨密度%人體質量指數%骨質疏鬆,絕經後%絕經後期%哈薩剋族%女(雌)性
관%골밀도%인체질량지수%골질소송,절경후%절경후기%합살극족%녀(자)성
Hip%Bone density%Body mass index%Osteoporosis,postmenopausal%Postmenopause%Kazakh nationality%Female
目的探讨绝经后哈萨克族妇女髋部体质指数(BMI)与骨密度(BMD)的相关关系。方法对符合条件的1009名绝经后哈萨克族妇女进行髋部BMD及BMI检测,按BMI的不同分为低体质量组、正常体质量组和超体质量组,比较3组身高、年龄以及BMD的差异。再将3个组按年龄分为41~50岁、51~60岁、61~70岁、71~80岁、81~90岁5个亚组,比较各亚组BMD的不同。结果绝经后哈萨克族妇女正常体质量组、超体质量组BMD均显著高于低体质量组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随年龄增大,各组骨密度均有所下降(P<0.05)。正常体质量组、超体质量组60岁以上亚组BMD均高于低体质量组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);71~80岁亚组中超体质量组BMD高于正常体质量组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论BMI、年龄是影响哈萨克族绝经后妇女髋部BMD的重要因素,对低BMI及高龄人群应定期监测BMD,早期发现骨量减少和骨质疏松,以便进行早期干预治疗。
目的探討絕經後哈薩剋族婦女髖部體質指數(BMI)與骨密度(BMD)的相關關繫。方法對符閤條件的1009名絕經後哈薩剋族婦女進行髖部BMD及BMI檢測,按BMI的不同分為低體質量組、正常體質量組和超體質量組,比較3組身高、年齡以及BMD的差異。再將3箇組按年齡分為41~50歲、51~60歲、61~70歲、71~80歲、81~90歲5箇亞組,比較各亞組BMD的不同。結果絕經後哈薩剋族婦女正常體質量組、超體質量組BMD均顯著高于低體質量組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。隨年齡增大,各組骨密度均有所下降(P<0.05)。正常體質量組、超體質量組60歲以上亞組BMD均高于低體質量組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);71~80歲亞組中超體質量組BMD高于正常體質量組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論BMI、年齡是影響哈薩剋族絕經後婦女髖部BMD的重要因素,對低BMI及高齡人群應定期鑑測BMD,早期髮現骨量減少和骨質疏鬆,以便進行早期榦預治療。
목적탐토절경후합살극족부녀관부체질지수(BMI)여골밀도(BMD)적상관관계。방법대부합조건적1009명절경후합살극족부녀진행관부BMD급BMI검측,안BMI적불동분위저체질량조、정상체질량조화초체질량조,비교3조신고、년령이급BMD적차이。재장3개조안년령분위41~50세、51~60세、61~70세、71~80세、81~90세5개아조,비교각아조BMD적불동。결과절경후합살극족부녀정상체질량조、초체질량조BMD균현저고우저체질량조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。수년령증대,각조골밀도균유소하강(P<0.05)。정상체질량조、초체질량조60세이상아조BMD균고우저체질량조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);71~80세아조중초체질량조BMD고우정상체질량조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론BMI、년령시영향합살극족절경후부녀관부BMD적중요인소,대저BMI급고령인군응정기감측BMD,조기발현골량감소화골질소송,이편진행조기간예치료。
Objective To determine the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) of hip and body mass index (BMI) in postmenopausal women in Kazakh nationality. Methods BMD of hip and BMI were examined for 1 009 postmenopausal women in Kazakh nationality who were consistent with the inclusion criteria. They were divided into 3 groups according to BMI, including underweight group, normal-weight group and overweight group. Body height, age and BMD in three groups were compared. Furthermore, 5 subgroups including 41-50 years old, 51-60 years old, 61-70 years old, 71-80 years old and 81-90 years old subgroup were divided according to age, and then the differences of BMD among the subgroups were compared. Results For postmenopausal women in Kazakh nationality, BMD in normal-weight and overweight groups were higher than those in underweight group (P <0.05). With the increase of age, BMD in all groups were lowered (P <0.05). For those who were over 60 years old, BMD in normal-weight and overweight groups were higher than those in underweight group, the difference had statistical significance (P <0.05); while for those who were 71-80 years old, BMD in overweight group was higher than that in normal-weight group (P <0.05). Conclusions BMI and age were important effect factors for hip BMD in postmenopausal women in Kazakh nationality. BMD should be monitored regularly for people with low BMI, or elderly women, so as to screen osteopenia and osteoporosis, and to carry out treatment intervention in early stage.