世界地理研究
世界地理研究
세계지리연구
WORLD REGIONAL STUDIES
2013年
3期
169-176
,共8页
褐色土地%识别%再利用%污染物
褐色土地%識彆%再利用%汙染物
갈색토지%식별%재이용%오염물
brownfield%identification%re-development%contaminants
褐色土地识别是其再开发的前提和基础。作者梳理国内外关于褐色土地定义，在此基础上界定褐色土地识别的概念，参考国外识别的经验并结合中国国情，制定褐色土地识别的框架和流程，并以福州市为例，选取2011年福州市国土资源局公开出让的35宗地块，实践城市褐色土地识别。通过第一阶段将地块原土地利用活动对照《重点污染源行业分类》标准进行筛选，选出疑似污染地块进行第二阶段环境污染信息收集和采样分析进行褐色土地识别，将褐色土地分为三类。结果显示：编号为03、04等25宗地块没有污染，识别为褐色土地类型Ⅰ；其余的疑似污染地块中，宗地编号为02、05等8地块，虽存在污染物，但污染物浓度低于标准值，识别为褐色土地类型Ⅱ；宗地编号为01、25地块的部分污染物浓度值超过标准值，需进行修复后才能再利用，识别为褐色土地类型Ⅲ。
褐色土地識彆是其再開髮的前提和基礎。作者梳理國內外關于褐色土地定義，在此基礎上界定褐色土地識彆的概唸，參攷國外識彆的經驗併結閤中國國情，製定褐色土地識彆的框架和流程，併以福州市為例，選取2011年福州市國土資源跼公開齣讓的35宗地塊，實踐城市褐色土地識彆。通過第一階段將地塊原土地利用活動對照《重點汙染源行業分類》標準進行篩選，選齣疑似汙染地塊進行第二階段環境汙染信息收集和採樣分析進行褐色土地識彆，將褐色土地分為三類。結果顯示：編號為03、04等25宗地塊沒有汙染，識彆為褐色土地類型Ⅰ；其餘的疑似汙染地塊中，宗地編號為02、05等8地塊，雖存在汙染物，但汙染物濃度低于標準值，識彆為褐色土地類型Ⅱ；宗地編號為01、25地塊的部分汙染物濃度值超過標準值，需進行脩複後纔能再利用，識彆為褐色土地類型Ⅲ。
갈색토지식별시기재개발적전제화기출。작자소리국내외관우갈색토지정의，재차기출상계정갈색토지식별적개념，삼고국외식별적경험병결합중국국정，제정갈색토지식별적광가화류정，병이복주시위례，선취2011년복주시국토자원국공개출양적35종지괴，실천성시갈색토지식별。통과제일계단장지괴원토지이용활동대조《중점오염원행업분류》표준진행사선，선출의사오염지괴진행제이계단배경오염신식수집화채양분석진행갈색토지식별，장갈색토지분위삼류。결과현시：편호위03、04등25종지괴몰유오염，식별위갈색토지류형Ⅰ；기여적의사오염지괴중，종지편호위02、05등8지괴，수존재오염물，단오염물농도저우표준치，식별위갈색토지류형Ⅱ；종지편호위01、25지괴적부분오염물농도치초과표준치，수진행수복후재능재이용，식별위갈색토지류형Ⅲ。
For the re-development of brownfield, identification is the prerequisite and ba-sis. After combing the concepts of brownfield at home and abroad, the author defined the concepts of brownfield in this study, and then formulated the brownfield identification framework and processes based on the reference to foreign recognition of experience and China's national conditions, and then took Fuzhou, the core city in the Economic Zone of the Western of Taiwan Strait for example, selected the public sale of 35 plots by the Land Resources Bureau in 2011 to practice urban brownfield identification. There is a two-step in the identification progress. Firstly, electing suspected Brownfields through comparing the original land-use activities with “the key sources of pollution Industry Classification Standard”; secondly, collecting Environmental pollution information of sus-pected Brownfields and sampled them for identification. The identified results showed that: parcel No. 03 and 04 and other 25 plots contained no pollution, identified as brownfield type Ⅰ; parcel number 02,05 and other 8 plots in the rest of the suspected polluted land, although had contaminants, but the pollutant concentration was below the standard value, identified as brownfield type II; parcel No. 01,25 block contained part of the concentration of pollutants exceeding the standard value, which was in need of repair after longer use, identified as brown land type III.
