CAJ | 학술논문

与2002-2007年的样本相比，2008年之后产生的行政学博士学位论文选题更为宽泛，研究方法规范性加强。以McCurdy和Cleary提出的六项指标研究发现，2008-2011年的博士论文在研究目的、研究方法、有效性、理论检验、因果关系、论题的重要性方面均有了不同程度的提高，但是论题的前沿性却出现数据下滑。虽然提高明显，但是行政学博士教育的顽疾依然存在，即西方理论遭遇本土问题后两者之间产生的张力，这也是未来行政学必须要摆脱的“身份危机”。
여2002-2007년적양본상비，2008년지후산생적행정학박사학위논문선제경위관범，연구방법규범성가강。이McCurdy화Cleary제출적륙항지표연구발현，2008-2011년적박사논문재연구목적、연구방법、유효성、이론검험、인과관계、론제적중요성방면균유료불동정도적제고，단시론제적전연성각출현수거하활。수연제고명현，단시행정학박사교육적완질의연존재，즉서방이론조우본토문제후량자지간산생적장력，저야시미래행정학필수요파탈적“신빈위궤”。
Up to 2012, the course of development of China's Administration has experienced three decades, during which doctoral education in 1998 to 2006 additional point for the sector has experienced two stages of development, at a later stage in 2008 year thesis began to emerge. According to the previous stage, 2008 doctoral thesis topics are broader, normative research methods are employed. Further McCurdy and Cleary the six indicators find that the later stage of the doctoral dissertation research goals, methods, effectiveness, theory testing, causal relationship on such topics as the importance improved to varying degrees, but the data analyses are in the decline. The disadvantages of the Chief Doctor of Education still exist, which reveals tension between Western theory suffered local Administration, which suggests that we should get rid of the“identity crisis”in the future.