CAJ | 학술논문

法律规则与法律原则存在区别，二者在推理的过程中也有不同的适用方法，适用规则的推理可称为先例推理，适用原则的推理可称为原则推理。而根据规范先例推理的四项命题，原则推理只是先例推理的一种特殊形式。由于四项命题的存在，法官的推理不总是司法推理，也常常会变成立法推理。先例推理理论的缺陷只能通过实践来解决。
법률규칙여법률원칙존재구별，이자재추리적과정중야유불동적괄용방법，괄용규칙적추리가칭위선례추리，괄용원칙적추리가칭위원칙추리。이근거규범선례추리적사항명제，원칙추리지시선례추리적일충특수형식。유우사항명제적존재，법관적추리불총시사법추리，야상상회변성입법추리。선례추리이론적결함지능통과실천래해결。
Legal rules are different from legal principles ,which are used in different ways in legal reasoning. Reasoning applies to rules can be called precedent reasoning, and reasoning applies to the principle can be called principles of reasoning. In fact, reasoning from principles is a special form of reasoning from precedent. The defect of reasoning from precedent can only be solved in practice.