河北经贸大学学报
河北經貿大學學報
하북경무대학학보
JOURNAL OF HEBEI UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND TRADE
2014年
6期
26-34
,共9页
社会主义公有制%国有企业效率效益%大锅饭论%凭票供应论%唯物主义%整体主义%崩溃边缘论%文化大革命
社會主義公有製%國有企業效率效益%大鍋飯論%憑票供應論%唯物主義%整體主義%崩潰邊緣論%文化大革命
사회주의공유제%국유기업효솔효익%대과반론%빙표공응론%유물주의%정체주의%붕궤변연론%문화대혁명
socialist public ownership%state-owned enterprise efficiency benefit%food prepared in a large canteen cauldron%ticket only theory%materialism%holism%collapse and margin theory%cultural revolution
“崩溃边缘论”“大锅饭论”和“凭票供应论”是支撑“国有企业效率效益低下论”的“三驾马车”。它们对中国历史和事实进行扭曲性、推断性、延伸性的唯心主义处理,再用封闭主义、双重标准在社会主义公有制、国有企业与效率效益低下之间建立起具有伪经济学性质的因果关系,不仅否定1949-1980年几亿人、几代人、几十年为新中国经济所做的艰苦卓绝的创业性、建设性和积累性发展贡献,而且从根本上否定社会主义公有制、国有企业的制度合理性。唯物主义、整体主义的分析表明,“崩溃边缘”是对事实的扭曲,而“大锅饭”和“凭票供应”则是中国特殊条件、特殊时期产生的特殊经济现象,而非社会主义公有制、国有企业的一般性经济规律(如凭票供应在西方也出现过)。而对这些特殊性的辩证唯物主义和交叉科学分析反过来恰恰证实中国社会主义公有制、国有企业不仅高效率高效益地发展了中国经济,而且成为中国经济改革不可或缺的基础。
“崩潰邊緣論”“大鍋飯論”和“憑票供應論”是支撐“國有企業效率效益低下論”的“三駕馬車”。它們對中國歷史和事實進行扭麯性、推斷性、延伸性的唯心主義處理,再用封閉主義、雙重標準在社會主義公有製、國有企業與效率效益低下之間建立起具有偽經濟學性質的因果關繫,不僅否定1949-1980年幾億人、幾代人、幾十年為新中國經濟所做的艱苦卓絕的創業性、建設性和積纍性髮展貢獻,而且從根本上否定社會主義公有製、國有企業的製度閤理性。唯物主義、整體主義的分析錶明,“崩潰邊緣”是對事實的扭麯,而“大鍋飯”和“憑票供應”則是中國特殊條件、特殊時期產生的特殊經濟現象,而非社會主義公有製、國有企業的一般性經濟規律(如憑票供應在西方也齣現過)。而對這些特殊性的辯證唯物主義和交扠科學分析反過來恰恰證實中國社會主義公有製、國有企業不僅高效率高效益地髮展瞭中國經濟,而且成為中國經濟改革不可或缺的基礎。
“붕궤변연론”“대과반론”화“빙표공응론”시지탱“국유기업효솔효익저하론”적“삼가마차”。타문대중국역사화사실진행뉴곡성、추단성、연신성적유심주의처리,재용봉폐주의、쌍중표준재사회주의공유제、국유기업여효솔효익저하지간건립기구유위경제학성질적인과관계,불부부정1949-1980년궤억인、궤대인、궤십년위신중국경제소주적간고탁절적창업성、건설성화적루성발전공헌,이차종근본상부정사회주의공유제、국유기업적제도합이성。유물주의、정체주의적분석표명,“붕궤변연”시대사실적뉴곡,이“대과반”화“빙표공응”칙시중국특수조건、특수시기산생적특수경제현상,이비사회주의공유제、국유기업적일반성경제규률(여빙표공응재서방야출현과)。이대저사특수성적변증유물주의화교차과학분석반과래흡흡증실중국사회주의공유제、국유기업불부고효솔고효익지발전료중국경제,이차성위중국경제개혁불가혹결적기출。
"Collapse and Margin Theory", "Food Prepared in a Large Canteen Cauldron" and "Ticket Only Theory" are the troika for the argument that inefficiency is an innate defect in State-owned-enterprises(SOE). Relying on an approach of ide-alism, the troika treats China's historical happenings with inference, speculation and distortion. In a scheme of close-system methodology and double-standard evaluation system, the pseudo-causality is thus established between inefficiency and SOE. It not only negates enterprising achievements made by several generations of hundreds of millions of people under extremely harsh conditions during 1949-1980 periods, but also completely discredits China's socialist experiment and SOE. A materialis-tic and holistic perspective stipulates that, while " Collapse and Margin Theory " is a simply distortion of history, " Food Pre-pared in a Large Canteen Cauldron " and " Ticket Only Theory " are special economic phenomena under special China's conditions in a special development period, rather than a general regularity of socialistic economy and SOE. A dialectic mate-rialistic and interdisciplinary approach toward these China's exclusive conditions validates the high effectiveness/efficiency of its socialistic SOE during the 1949-1980 periods, and that an economy established thereby becomes an indispensable foundation of China's economic reform thereafter.