中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2013年
7期
729-731
,共3页
表演式培训%不良事件%护理人员
錶縯式培訓%不良事件%護理人員
표연식배훈%불량사건%호리인원
Performance training%Adverse event%Nurse staff
目的探讨表演式培训在不良事件教学中的应用与效果。方法将我院2012年新入职的120名护士随机分到研究组和对照组,每组60人。研究组采用表演式培训方式,对照组采用传统培训方式。通过不良事件知识考核成绩、不良事件发生数及学员对培训的满意度等各项指标评价培训效果。结果研究组和对照组不良事件知识考核成绩分别为(96.38±3.465)和(84.90±3.245);学员对培训的满意度分别为(9.57±0.563)和(7.35±0.917),研究组明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);而研究组学员不良事件发生数(n=3)则明显低于对照组(n=15),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论在不良事件教学中,采用表演式培训,能很好地调动学员的学习兴趣,亲身体验的形式和自查自纠机制让学员对知识留下深刻的印象,降低了新入职护士不良事件的发生率。
目的探討錶縯式培訓在不良事件教學中的應用與效果。方法將我院2012年新入職的120名護士隨機分到研究組和對照組,每組60人。研究組採用錶縯式培訓方式,對照組採用傳統培訓方式。通過不良事件知識攷覈成績、不良事件髮生數及學員對培訓的滿意度等各項指標評價培訓效果。結果研究組和對照組不良事件知識攷覈成績分彆為(96.38±3.465)和(84.90±3.245);學員對培訓的滿意度分彆為(9.57±0.563)和(7.35±0.917),研究組明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);而研究組學員不良事件髮生數(n=3)則明顯低于對照組(n=15),差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論在不良事件教學中,採用錶縯式培訓,能很好地調動學員的學習興趣,親身體驗的形式和自查自糾機製讓學員對知識留下深刻的印象,降低瞭新入職護士不良事件的髮生率。
목적탐토표연식배훈재불량사건교학중적응용여효과。방법장아원2012년신입직적120명호사수궤분도연구조화대조조,매조60인。연구조채용표연식배훈방식,대조조채용전통배훈방식。통과불량사건지식고핵성적、불량사건발생수급학원대배훈적만의도등각항지표평개배훈효과。결과연구조화대조조불량사건지식고핵성적분별위(96.38±3.465)화(84.90±3.245);학원대배훈적만의도분별위(9.57±0.563)화(7.35±0.917),연구조명현고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);이연구조학원불량사건발생수(n=3)칙명현저우대조조(n=15),차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론재불량사건교학중,채용표연식배훈,능흔호지조동학원적학습흥취,친신체험적형식화자사자규궤제양학원대지식류하심각적인상,강저료신입직호사불량사건적발생솔。
Objective To investigate the application and effect on the performance training of adverse events, and to improve the quality of nursing teaching. Methods Totally 120 new graduate nurses in our hospital were randomly divided into study group(n=60)and control group(n=60). Study group used performance training while control group used traditional training mode and evaluation was made from the adverse event knowledge score , number of adverse events and satisfaction degree of stu-dents. Results Adverse event knowledge score of study group (9.57±0.563) was obviously higher than that of control group(84.90±3.245). Satisfaction degree of students in study group(9.57±0.563) was higher than that of control group(7.35 ±0.917), with statistical differences(P<0.01). Number of ad-verse events(n=3) was obviously lower in study group than in control group(n=15), with statistical differences(P<0.01). Conclusion In adverse events teaching, performance training can be helpful in arousing students' interests in learning. Experiences of self-examination and self-correction also make the students have a deep impression on knowledge, which improves the quality of adverse events teaching and reduces the incidence of adverse events in the new graduates.