中华临床医师杂志(电子版)
中華臨床醫師雜誌(電子版)
중화림상의사잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICIANS(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2013年
8期
3332-3335
,共4页
徐丁%黄涛%朱云开%陈亚青%齐隽
徐丁%黃濤%硃雲開%陳亞青%齊雋
서정%황도%주운개%진아청%제준
前列腺增生%膀胱出口梗阻%尿流率%前列腺体积
前列腺增生%膀胱齣口梗阻%尿流率%前列腺體積
전렬선증생%방광출구경조%뇨류솔%전렬선체적
Prostatic hyperplasia%Bladder outlet obstruction%Qmax%Prostate volume
目的联合应用多种无创检测方法诊断良性前列腺增生患者膀胱出口梗阻。方法收集70例良性前列腺增生患者,所有患者均完成国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),前列腺特异性抗原(PSA),经直肠前列腺超声[(包括前列腺体积(TPV),移行区体积(TZV),移行区指数(TZI),膀胱内前列腺突出(IPP)],尿流率检测以及尿流动力学检测。根据尿流动力学检测结果分为梗阻组与非梗阻组。结果梗阻组Qmax显著低于非梗阻组,TPV、TZV、TZI、IPP、Qmax与膀胱出口梗阻指数有显著相关性,通过多因素回归得到梗阻诊断模型:BDI=0.025×TPV-0.457×Qmax+3.611,ROC曲线下面积为0.876。结论 BDI结合了无创、简易、价格低廉的方法,在诊断和评估良性前列腺增生患者是否存在膀胱出口梗阻中有着一定的价值,能为临床医师的决策提供一定的帮助。
目的聯閤應用多種無創檢測方法診斷良性前列腺增生患者膀胱齣口梗阻。方法收集70例良性前列腺增生患者,所有患者均完成國際前列腺癥狀評分(IPSS),前列腺特異性抗原(PSA),經直腸前列腺超聲[(包括前列腺體積(TPV),移行區體積(TZV),移行區指數(TZI),膀胱內前列腺突齣(IPP)],尿流率檢測以及尿流動力學檢測。根據尿流動力學檢測結果分為梗阻組與非梗阻組。結果梗阻組Qmax顯著低于非梗阻組,TPV、TZV、TZI、IPP、Qmax與膀胱齣口梗阻指數有顯著相關性,通過多因素迴歸得到梗阻診斷模型:BDI=0.025×TPV-0.457×Qmax+3.611,ROC麯線下麵積為0.876。結論 BDI結閤瞭無創、簡易、價格低廉的方法,在診斷和評估良性前列腺增生患者是否存在膀胱齣口梗阻中有著一定的價值,能為臨床醫師的決策提供一定的幫助。
목적연합응용다충무창검측방법진단량성전렬선증생환자방광출구경조。방법수집70례량성전렬선증생환자,소유환자균완성국제전렬선증상평분(IPSS),전렬선특이성항원(PSA),경직장전렬선초성[(포괄전렬선체적(TPV),이행구체적(TZV),이행구지수(TZI),방광내전렬선돌출(IPP)],뇨류솔검측이급뇨류동역학검측。근거뇨류동역학검측결과분위경조조여비경조조。결과경조조Qmax현저저우비경조조,TPV、TZV、TZI、IPP、Qmax여방광출구경조지수유현저상관성,통과다인소회귀득도경조진단모형:BDI=0.025×TPV-0.457×Qmax+3.611,ROC곡선하면적위0.876。결론 BDI결합료무창、간역、개격저렴적방법,재진단화평고량성전렬선증생환자시부존재방광출구경조중유착일정적개치,능위림상의사적결책제공일정적방조。
Objective To diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction ( BOO) among benign prostate hyperplasia ( BPH) patients by combination of noninvasive methods .Methods The study involved 70 patients who visited our department with lower urinary tract symptom ( LUTS ) suggestive BPH .All the patients were evaluated with the International Prostate Symptom Score ( IPSS), serum prostate specific antigen ( PSA) level, total prostate volume (TPV),transitional zone volume(TZV),transitional zone index(TZI),intravesical prostatic protrusion(IPP)and urodynamic studies .The urodynamic results were used to divide patients into 2 groups with and without BOO . Results Qmax in the group with BOO was significantly lower than it in the group without BOO .TPV,TZV,TZI, IPP,Qmax were all significantly associated with BOOI ,BOO diagnosing index was calculated by logistics regression:BDI=0.025 ×TPV-0.457 ×Qmax+3.611 .AUC of BDI was 0.876 .Conclusion BDI could diagnose BOO with considerable accuracy ,which could help doctors select treatment of BPH patients .