新疆医科大学学报
新疆醫科大學學報
신강의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF XINJIANG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2013年
8期
1169-1171,1175
,共4页
阿勒滕齐齐格%陈玲%伊力多斯·阿合塔莫夫
阿勒滕齊齊格%陳玲%伊力多斯·阿閤塔莫伕
아륵등제제격%진령%이력다사·아합탑막부
2型糖尿病%糖尿病肾病%尿微量白蛋白排泄量%脂蛋白a
2型糖尿病%糖尿病腎病%尿微量白蛋白排洩量%脂蛋白a
2형당뇨병%당뇨병신병%뇨미량백단백배설량%지단백a
T2DM%diabetic nephropathy%UAE%lipoprotein(a)
目的探讨糖尿病肾脏损害的相关因素。方法将符合入选标准的168例2型糖尿病患者根据有无糖尿病肾病分为糖尿病肾病组(DN组,90例)和非糖尿病肾病组(非DN组,78例),DN组再分为DN早期组(62例)和DN 中晚期组(28例),进行糖尿病肾脏损害的相关因素分析。结果 DN组与非DN组间空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、甘油三酯、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白、载脂蛋白a、载脂蛋白b比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);高血压、脂蛋白a和纤维蛋白原差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);内生肌酐清除率和尿微量白蛋白组间差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。3组间比较,DN早期组与非DN组间脂蛋白a差异有统计学意义(P <0.01),但尿微量白蛋白(UAE)差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。Logistic回归显示脂蛋白a是糖尿病肾病的危险因素,文化程度是糖尿病肾病的保护因素。结论脂蛋白a与糖尿病肾病损害程度密切相关,随着糖尿病肾病的加重,脂蛋白a进行性升高。脂蛋白a可以作为早期预测指标。
目的探討糖尿病腎髒損害的相關因素。方法將符閤入選標準的168例2型糖尿病患者根據有無糖尿病腎病分為糖尿病腎病組(DN組,90例)和非糖尿病腎病組(非DN組,78例),DN組再分為DN早期組(62例)和DN 中晚期組(28例),進行糖尿病腎髒損害的相關因素分析。結果 DN組與非DN組間空腹血糖、糖化血紅蛋白、甘油三酯、總膽固醇、高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白、載脂蛋白a、載脂蛋白b比較差異無統計學意義(P >0.05);高血壓、脂蛋白a和纖維蛋白原差異有統計學意義(P <0.05);內生肌酐清除率和尿微量白蛋白組間差異有統計學意義(P <0.01)。3組間比較,DN早期組與非DN組間脂蛋白a差異有統計學意義(P <0.01),但尿微量白蛋白(UAE)差異無統計學意義(P >0.05)。Logistic迴歸顯示脂蛋白a是糖尿病腎病的危險因素,文化程度是糖尿病腎病的保護因素。結論脂蛋白a與糖尿病腎病損害程度密切相關,隨著糖尿病腎病的加重,脂蛋白a進行性升高。脂蛋白a可以作為早期預測指標。
목적탐토당뇨병신장손해적상관인소。방법장부합입선표준적168례2형당뇨병환자근거유무당뇨병신병분위당뇨병신병조(DN조,90례)화비당뇨병신병조(비DN조,78례),DN조재분위DN조기조(62례)화DN 중만기조(28례),진행당뇨병신장손해적상관인소분석。결과 DN조여비DN조간공복혈당、당화혈홍단백、감유삼지、총담고순、고밀도지단백、저밀도지단백、재지단백a、재지단백b비교차이무통계학의의(P >0.05);고혈압、지단백a화섬유단백원차이유통계학의의(P <0.05);내생기항청제솔화뇨미량백단백조간차이유통계학의의(P <0.01)。3조간비교,DN조기조여비DN조간지단백a차이유통계학의의(P <0.01),단뇨미량백단백(UAE)차이무통계학의의(P >0.05)。Logistic회귀현시지단백a시당뇨병신병적위험인소,문화정도시당뇨병신병적보호인소。결론지단백a여당뇨병신병손해정도밀절상관,수착당뇨병신병적가중,지단백a진행성승고。지단백a가이작위조기예측지표。
Objective To analyze the related factors of diabetic nephropathy . Methods According to whether the patients suffered from diabetic nephropathy or not ,we divided the 168 patients into 2 groups (non-diabetic nephropathy group and nephropathy group ) in order to analyze the related factors w hich may low dow n the renal function .Results T he number of non-diabetic nephropathy patient is 78 and the num-ber of the diabetic nephropathy patient is 90 .Between DN group and non-DN group ,fasting plasma glu-cose (FPG) ,Glycohemoglobin A (HbA1C) ,triglyeride (TG) ,total cholesterol (TC) ,high-density lipo-protein HDL-C ,low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) ,ApoA ,ApoB had no statistical disparity (P >0 .05) . LPa and FIB had statistical disparity between DN group and non-DN group (P<0 .05) .Ccr and UAE had significantly statistical disparity between DN group and non-DN group (P <0 .01) .Comparisons between three groups showed that LPa had significantly statistical disparity between earlier DN jm group and non-DN group (P <0 .01) ,but UAE had no statistical disparity (P>0 .05) .Logistic return showed that LPa was hazards of DN .The protection of oneself depends on his cultural degree .Conclusion LPa takes part in the progress of DN ,and is crossly-related with the extent of damage of DN ,LPa is gradually increasing according to the extent of damage of DN .We could use LPa as early prediction index .