中国伤残医学
中國傷殘醫學
중국상잔의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND DISABILITY MEDICINE
2013年
8期
46-48
,共3页
痉挛型双瘫%电刺激%肌力%运动功能
痙攣型雙癱%電刺激%肌力%運動功能
경련형쌍탄%전자격%기력%운동공능
Spastic diplegia%Functional electrical stimulation%Muscle strength%Motor function
目的:探讨功能性电刺激对痉挛型双瘫型脑瘫患儿运动功能的影响。方法:选择痉挛型双瘫型脑瘫患儿共60例,将全部患儿随机分为治疗组与对照组,每组各30例,对照组采用常规综合康复治疗,治疗组在此基础上增加功能性电刺激治疗。刺激部位:胫骨前肌、股四头肌、臀大肌。2组患儿均持续治疗1个疗程,在康复治疗前及治疗后均进行粗大运动功能测试量表( gross motor function measure scale ,GMFM)检测徒手肌力法( manual muscle testing ,MMT)测试。结果:康复治疗后,治疗组肌力提高总有效率为83.33%。对照组肌力提高总有效率为66.67%,2组肌力比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);治疗后,2组GMFM总分均显著高于治疗前(P<0.01),治疗组GMFM总分显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:功能性电刺激有助于改善脑瘫患儿的运动功能。
目的:探討功能性電刺激對痙攣型雙癱型腦癱患兒運動功能的影響。方法:選擇痙攣型雙癱型腦癱患兒共60例,將全部患兒隨機分為治療組與對照組,每組各30例,對照組採用常規綜閤康複治療,治療組在此基礎上增加功能性電刺激治療。刺激部位:脛骨前肌、股四頭肌、臀大肌。2組患兒均持續治療1箇療程,在康複治療前及治療後均進行粗大運動功能測試量錶( gross motor function measure scale ,GMFM)檢測徒手肌力法( manual muscle testing ,MMT)測試。結果:康複治療後,治療組肌力提高總有效率為83.33%。對照組肌力提高總有效率為66.67%,2組肌力比較有顯著性差異(P<0.05);治療後,2組GMFM總分均顯著高于治療前(P<0.01),治療組GMFM總分顯著高于對照組(P<0.05)。結論:功能性電刺激有助于改善腦癱患兒的運動功能。
목적:탐토공능성전자격대경련형쌍탄형뇌탄환인운동공능적영향。방법:선택경련형쌍탄형뇌탄환인공60례,장전부환인수궤분위치료조여대조조,매조각30례,대조조채용상규종합강복치료,치료조재차기출상증가공능성전자격치료。자격부위:경골전기、고사두기、둔대기。2조환인균지속치료1개료정,재강복치료전급치료후균진행조대운동공능측시량표( gross motor function measure scale ,GMFM)검측도수기역법( manual muscle testing ,MMT)측시。결과:강복치료후,치료조기력제고총유효솔위83.33%。대조조기력제고총유효솔위66.67%,2조기력비교유현저성차이(P<0.05);치료후,2조GMFM총분균현저고우치료전(P<0.01),치료조GMFM총분현저고우대조조(P<0.05)。결론:공능성전자격유조우개선뇌탄환인적운동공능。
Objective: To investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation ( FES) on motor function in children with spastic diplegia.Methods:60 children with spastic diplegia were randomly divided into treatment group ( n=30 ) and control group(n=30).All patients received combined therapy,while the treatment group was added with FES.The surface electrodes were applied on the anterior tibialis,quadriceps and gluteus maximus.The treatment was performed for 3 months and the meas-urements of gross motor function measure scale( GMFM) and manual muscle testing( MMT) were made before and after the reha-bilitation training for both groups.Results: The total effective rate of strength improvements in the treatment group was 83. 33%,which was 66.67% in the control group.There was significant difference between the two groups(P <0.05).It was found that the total of GMFM increased significantly after 3 months in both groups(P<0.01) and it was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group ( P<0 .05 ) .Conclusion: Functional electrical stimulation could improve the func-tional performance in children with spastic diplegia .