按摩与康复医学
按摩與康複醫學
안마여강복의학
Chinese Manipulation & Rehabilitation Medicine
2013年
9期
27-28
,共2页
廖燕锬%林茜%陈岚榕%向秋阳%刘燕平%蔡素芳%杨珊莉
廖燕錟%林茜%陳嵐榕%嚮鞦暘%劉燕平%蔡素芳%楊珊莉
료연담%림천%진람용%향추양%류연평%채소방%양산리
脑卒中%屈曲反射%点穴%Bechterev法%伤害性屈曲反射诱发法%足背外侧刺激区诱发法
腦卒中%屈麯反射%點穴%Bechterev法%傷害性屈麯反射誘髮法%足揹外側刺激區誘髮法
뇌졸중%굴곡반사%점혈%Bechterev법%상해성굴곡반사유발법%족배외측자격구유발법
cerebral apoplexy%flexion reflex%digital acupoint pressure%the Bechterev method%nociceptive flexion reflex evoked method%lateral dor-sum of foot stimulation evoked method
目的：对比点穴法和常规康复方法（Bechterev法、伤害性屈曲反射诱发法、足背外侧“刺激区”诱发法）诱发脑卒中患者屈曲反应成功率。方法：对30例患者分别用4种手法诱发屈曲反应进行观察，成功诱发为“阳性”，不能诱发为“阴性”。结果：点穴法诱发屈曲反射阳性率高于其它3种常规康复方法（P<0.01，P<0.05）。结论：点穴法比其它三种常规康复方法更容易诱发脑卒中患者下肢屈曲反射。
目的：對比點穴法和常規康複方法（Bechterev法、傷害性屈麯反射誘髮法、足揹外側“刺激區”誘髮法）誘髮腦卒中患者屈麯反應成功率。方法：對30例患者分彆用4種手法誘髮屈麯反應進行觀察，成功誘髮為“暘性”，不能誘髮為“陰性”。結果：點穴法誘髮屈麯反射暘性率高于其它3種常規康複方法（P<0.01，P<0.05）。結論：點穴法比其它三種常規康複方法更容易誘髮腦卒中患者下肢屈麯反射。
목적：대비점혈법화상규강복방법（Bechterev법、상해성굴곡반사유발법、족배외측“자격구”유발법）유발뇌졸중환자굴곡반응성공솔。방법：대30례환자분별용4충수법유발굴곡반응진행관찰，성공유발위“양성”，불능유발위“음성”。결과：점혈법유발굴곡반사양성솔고우기타3충상규강복방법（P<0.01，P<0.05）。결론：점혈법비기타삼충상규강복방법경용역유발뇌졸중환자하지굴곡반사。
Objective:To compare the success rate of flexion reaction with digital acupoint pressure and routine rehabilitation method (the Bechterev method, nociceptive flexion reflex evoked method, lateral dorsum of foot stimulation evoked method) in stroke patients. Methods:30 cases treated with 4 methods to induce flexion reaction were observed, successfully induced as"positive", not induced as"negative". Results:The positive rate of flexion reaction with digital acupoint pressure was higher than those with three other conventional rehabilitation methods (P<0.01, P<0.05). Conclu-sion:Digital acupoint pressure is easier for stroke patients to induce flexion reaction of lower limbs, comparing with three other conventional rehabili-tation methods.
