中国饲料
中國飼料
중국사료
CHINA FEED
2013年
11期
19-22
,共4页
王艳菲%李春雷%潘春方%李欣新%李洋%刘凯玉%王丽娟%张永根
王豔菲%李春雷%潘春方%李訢新%李洋%劉凱玉%王麗娟%張永根
왕염비%리춘뢰%반춘방%리흔신%리양%류개옥%왕려연%장영근
GI2009%粗饲料%品质评定
GI2009%粗飼料%品質評定
GI2009%조사료%품질평정
GI2009%forage%quality evaluation
本试验旨在对饲料分级指数技术(GI2009)进行研究和应用,选择8种常见粗饲料原料,对其常规营养成分含量、可消化蛋白质含量、物理有效因子、产奶净能以及干物质随意采食量进行测定,然后根据GI2009公式得到几种粗饲料的GI2009值。结果表明:(1)分别按粗蛋白质、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维等含量对粗饲料的品质排序结果均不一致;(2)按GI2009评价粗饲料的品质从高到低依次是苜蓿、宁夏正鑫全株玉米青贮、宁夏海生全株玉米青贮、上海青贮、沈阳青贮、谷草、豌豆秧、稻草;(3)按GI2001评价粗饲料的品质从高到低依次是苜蓿、宁夏正鑫全株玉米青贮、宁夏海生全株玉米青贮、上海青贮、沈阳青贮、谷草、豌豆秧、稻草。由此可见,单一的指标不能准确评价粗饲料的营养品质,用GI2009评定粗饲料的品质与GI2001结果一致,8种粗饲料中,营养价值最高的是苜蓿,其次是青贮,最低的是稻草;GI2009能更科学合理地评定粗饲料的营养价值。
本試驗旨在對飼料分級指數技術(GI2009)進行研究和應用,選擇8種常見粗飼料原料,對其常規營養成分含量、可消化蛋白質含量、物理有效因子、產奶淨能以及榦物質隨意採食量進行測定,然後根據GI2009公式得到幾種粗飼料的GI2009值。結果錶明:(1)分彆按粗蛋白質、中性洗滌纖維、痠性洗滌纖維等含量對粗飼料的品質排序結果均不一緻;(2)按GI2009評價粗飼料的品質從高到低依次是苜蓿、寧夏正鑫全株玉米青貯、寧夏海生全株玉米青貯、上海青貯、瀋暘青貯、穀草、豌豆秧、稻草;(3)按GI2001評價粗飼料的品質從高到低依次是苜蓿、寧夏正鑫全株玉米青貯、寧夏海生全株玉米青貯、上海青貯、瀋暘青貯、穀草、豌豆秧、稻草。由此可見,單一的指標不能準確評價粗飼料的營養品質,用GI2009評定粗飼料的品質與GI2001結果一緻,8種粗飼料中,營養價值最高的是苜蓿,其次是青貯,最低的是稻草;GI2009能更科學閤理地評定粗飼料的營養價值。
본시험지재대사료분급지수기술(GI2009)진행연구화응용,선택8충상견조사료원료,대기상규영양성분함량、가소화단백질함량、물리유효인자、산내정능이급간물질수의채식량진행측정,연후근거GI2009공식득도궤충조사료적GI2009치。결과표명:(1)분별안조단백질、중성세조섬유、산성세조섬유등함량대조사료적품질배서결과균불일치;(2)안GI2009평개조사료적품질종고도저의차시목숙、저하정흠전주옥미청저、저하해생전주옥미청저、상해청저、침양청저、곡초、완두앙、도초;(3)안GI2001평개조사료적품질종고도저의차시목숙、저하정흠전주옥미청저、저하해생전주옥미청저、상해청저、침양청저、곡초、완두앙、도초。유차가견,단일적지표불능준학평개조사료적영양품질,용GI2009평정조사료적품질여GI2001결과일치,8충조사료중,영양개치최고적시목숙,기차시청저,최저적시도초;GI2009능경과학합리지평정조사료적영양개치。
This test was conducted to study graded index (GI2009)technology and its application.Eight kinds of com-mon forages were selected to determine their conventional nutrient content,digestible crude protein (DCP),physical effec-tive factor(pef),net energy(NEL)and dry matter intake (DMI),Then use the formula of GI2009 to get the GI2009 values.The results show that:(1)According to the CP,neutral detergent fiber (NDF)and acide detergent fiber (ADF)contents,the roughage quality sorting results were inconsistent. (2)According to the quality evaluation of GI2009,the roughage quality from high to low in turn was alfalfa,the whole plant silage corn in ningxia zhengxin,the whole plant silage corn in ningxia-haisheng,silage corn in shanghai,silage corn in shenyang,millet straw,pea seedling,rice straw.(3)According to the quality evaluation of GI2001,the roughage quality from high to low in turn was alfalfa,the whole plant silage corn of ningxia zhengx-in,the whole plant silage corn of ningxia haisheng,silage corn in shanghai,silage corn in shenyang,millet straw,pea seedling,rice straw.The results indicated that,it was not exact to evaluate nutritive value of pasturage by single nutritive indicators,the result of the GI2009 and GI2001 was the same,the highest nutritional value in the eight kinds of roughage was alfalfa,the second was silage corn,the lowest was rice straw;GI2009 could be more scientific and reasonable for the quality evaluation of forage.