CAJ | 학술논문

目的：通过比较中国31个省区的医疗卫生资源的人均配置水平，揭示各省区医疗资源配置特点及影响因素。方法：选取7个代表性指标，采用聚类分析方法，把31个省区的人均配置水平分成5个等级；根据5个等级，提出影响人均配置水平等级的影响因素，建立有序Probit模型并估计。结果：北京、上海、西藏分别属于第一、第四、第五等级，天津等7省区属于第二等级，河北等21省区属于第三等级；地区人均国民生产总值、家庭可支配收入等4个因素均显著影响人均配置水平。结论：经济发展与医疗资源的人均配置水平不均衡，政府卫生支出比重与人均医疗资源配置水平呈负向相关关系。
목적：통과비교중국31개성구적의료위생자원적인균배치수평，게시각성구의료자원배치특점급영향인소。방법：선취7개대표성지표，채용취류분석방법，파31개성구적인균배치수평분성5개등급；근거5개등급，제출영향인균배치수평등급적영향인소，건립유서Probit모형병고계。결과：북경、상해、서장분별속우제일、제사、제오등급，천진등7성구속우제이등급，하북등21성구속우제삼등급；지구인균국민생산총치、가정가지배수입등4개인소균현저영향인균배치수평。결론：경제발전여의료자원적인균배치수평불균형，정부위생지출비중여인균의료자원배치수평정부향상관관계。
Objective:Through comparing per capita allocation level of health resources in 31 provinces of China, the characteristics and the influencing factors of health resource allocation in each province are reveled. Methods: Selecting 7 representative indexes and using cluster analysis methods to divide per capita allocation level of 31 provinces into 5 grades; the influencing factors of per capita allocation level are proposed based on 5 grades and the ordered Probit model is built and estimated. Results: Beijing, Shanghai and Tibet respectively marked the first, the fourth and the fifth grade, 7 provinces ( including Tianjin) belong to the second grade, 21 provinces ( including Hebei ) belong to the third grade; four factors such as per capita GDP , family disposable income and so on all significantly affect per capita allocation level. Conclusion: Economic development and per capita allocation level of health resources are not balanced. The proportion of government health expenditure is negatively correlated with per capita allocation level of health resources.