肿瘤药学
腫瘤藥學
종류약학
ANTI-TUMOR PHARMACY
2013年
5期
378-381
,共4页
王青兵%王雁军%张勇%黄天臣%肖建安
王青兵%王雁軍%張勇%黃天臣%肖建安
왕청병%왕안군%장용%황천신%초건안
老年晚期胃癌%替吉奥%化疗%FOLFOX4方案
老年晚期胃癌%替吉奧%化療%FOLFOX4方案
노년만기위암%체길오%화료%FOLFOX4방안
Elderly Advanced Gastric Cancer%S-1%Chemotherapy%FOLFOX4 regimen
目的:观察单药口服替吉奥治疗老年晚期胃癌的近期临床效果和不良反应的发生情况。方法将62例老年晚期胃癌患者随机分成替吉奥组36例和对照组26例。替吉奥组采用替吉奥胶囊(S-1)单药口服治疗,对照组采用FOLFOX4方案化疗,治疗3个周期后评估和比较两组的临床疗效及不良反应。结果两组治疗有效率(25.0%vs.26.9%)及1年生存率(47.20%vs.53.8%)比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);但替吉奥组生活质量的改善率明显高于对照组(33.3%vs.11.5%, P<0.05);对照组不良反应的发生率明显高于替吉奥组(P<0.05),周围神经毒性仅见于对照组。结论口服替吉奥治疗老年晚期胃癌的近期疗效与FOLFOX4方案相当,但较其更安全。
目的:觀察單藥口服替吉奧治療老年晚期胃癌的近期臨床效果和不良反應的髮生情況。方法將62例老年晚期胃癌患者隨機分成替吉奧組36例和對照組26例。替吉奧組採用替吉奧膠囊(S-1)單藥口服治療,對照組採用FOLFOX4方案化療,治療3箇週期後評估和比較兩組的臨床療效及不良反應。結果兩組治療有效率(25.0%vs.26.9%)及1年生存率(47.20%vs.53.8%)比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05);但替吉奧組生活質量的改善率明顯高于對照組(33.3%vs.11.5%, P<0.05);對照組不良反應的髮生率明顯高于替吉奧組(P<0.05),週圍神經毒性僅見于對照組。結論口服替吉奧治療老年晚期胃癌的近期療效與FOLFOX4方案相噹,但較其更安全。
목적:관찰단약구복체길오치료노년만기위암적근기림상효과화불량반응적발생정황。방법장62례노년만기위암환자수궤분성체길오조36례화대조조26례。체길오조채용체길오효낭(S-1)단약구복치료,대조조채용FOLFOX4방안화료,치료3개주기후평고화비교량조적림상료효급불량반응。결과량조치료유효솔(25.0%vs.26.9%)급1년생존솔(47.20%vs.53.8%)비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05);단체길오조생활질량적개선솔명현고우대조조(33.3%vs.11.5%, P<0.05);대조조불량반응적발생솔명현고우체길오조(P<0.05),주위신경독성부견우대조조。결론구복체길오치료노년만기위암적근기료효여FOLFOX4방안상당,단교기경안전。
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Tegafer Gimeracil Oteracil Porassium (S-1) in the treat-ment of elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods 62 cases of elderly advanced gastric cancer were randomly divided into two groups:the S-1 group (n=36) and the control group (n=26). The S-1 group was only treated with S-1 twice daily, and the control group was treated by FOLFOX4. The effect and toxicities in the two groups were analyzed after three cycles of chemotherapy. Results No significant difference was observed in response rate (25.0%vs. 26.9%) and one-year survival rate (47.20%vs. 53.8%) between the two groups. But the improvement rate of quality of life was significantly higher in S-1 group than in the control group, and the adverse reaction rate was lower in S-1 group than in control group. Peripheral neurotoxicity was only observed in the control group. Conclusion The S-1 had an equivalent clinical efficacy to FOLFOX4 regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer, but it was safer than FOLFOX4 regimen.