科教导刊
科教導刊
과교도간
THE GUIDE OF SCIENCE & EDUCATION
2014年
6期
79-79,83
,共2页
高职专业%教学质量保证%教学质量监控
高職專業%教學質量保證%教學質量鑑控
고직전업%교학질량보증%교학질량감공
higher professional education%teaching quality assurance%teaching quality monitoring
本文对高职专业教学质量保证文献进行了回顾。研究发现，质量保证与质量监控侧重点略有不同，国外侧重教学质量保证，国内侧重教学质量监控。国外研究重在实证，国内重在理论。国外文献不足在于没有区分高职专业教学与其它高等教育教学，而国内研究缺乏实证。
本文對高職專業教學質量保證文獻進行瞭迴顧。研究髮現，質量保證與質量鑑控側重點略有不同，國外側重教學質量保證，國內側重教學質量鑑控。國外研究重在實證，國內重在理論。國外文獻不足在于沒有區分高職專業教學與其它高等教育教學，而國內研究缺乏實證。
본문대고직전업교학질량보증문헌진행료회고。연구발현，질량보증여질량감공측중점략유불동，국외측중교학질량보증，국내측중교학질량감공。국외연구중재실증，국내중재이론。국외문헌불족재우몰유구분고직전업교학여기타고등교육교학，이국내연구결핍실증。
This paper reviewed professional Teaching Quality Assurance Literature. The study found that quality assurance and quality control are in different, researchers abroad focused on teaching quality assurance by empirical study, domestic researchers focused on teaching quality monitoring by theoretical study. It is lack of distinction between higher professional education and other education from foreign literature, while the domestic literature is lack of empirical studies.
