中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2014年
4期
410-412
,共3页
王慧明%朱芳%王焕生%闫忠政
王慧明%硃芳%王煥生%閆忠政
왕혜명%주방%왕환생%염충정
高血压%护士%诊所血压%24 h动态血压
高血壓%護士%診所血壓%24 h動態血壓
고혈압%호사%진소혈압%24 h동태혈압
Hypertension%Nurses%Office blood pressure%Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
目的:分析三级甲等医院临床护理单元从业护士诊室血压(OBP)及动态血压(ABPM)监测数据。方法选择参加2012年春季体检的辽宁省人民医院和辽宁省金秋医院临床科室从业护士71名为分析对象,对照组为76名同期参加健康体检的某事业单位女职工。全部入选对象均接受了OBP和24 h-ABPM检测。结果从业护士组的隐性高血压(MH)患病率为14.08%,明显高于对照组的2.63%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.423,P<0.05),而白大衣高血压(WCH)患病率为1.41%,明显低于对照组的11.84%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.761,P<0.05)。 OBP测量指标比较中,从业护士组的OSBP、ODSP平均测量值分别为(125.35±15.14),(76.15±9.67) mmHg,均明显低于对照组的(131.71±16.62),(82.94±11.25)mmHg,差异有统计学意义(t分别为2.418,3.907;P<0.05)。 ABPM监测指标比较中,从业护士组的24 h-mSBP、24 h-mDBP分别为(127.34±13.46),(79.47±10.36)mmHg,均明显高于对照组的(121.09±13.73),(75.82±9.18)mmHg,差异有统计学意义(t分别为2.781,2.261;P<0.05)。dSBP、dDBP、nSBP、nDBP测量值和负荷值均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t分别为2.918,3.284,2.547,3.544,2.864,2.561,2.623,2.837;P<0.05)。结论大医院临床护理单元从业护士群体ABPM各类监测指标及血压负荷值较高,OBP测量值较低,并存在着MH患病率增加现象。
目的:分析三級甲等醫院臨床護理單元從業護士診室血壓(OBP)及動態血壓(ABPM)鑑測數據。方法選擇參加2012年春季體檢的遼寧省人民醫院和遼寧省金鞦醫院臨床科室從業護士71名為分析對象,對照組為76名同期參加健康體檢的某事業單位女職工。全部入選對象均接受瞭OBP和24 h-ABPM檢測。結果從業護士組的隱性高血壓(MH)患病率為14.08%,明顯高于對照組的2.63%,差異有統計學意義(χ2=6.423,P<0.05),而白大衣高血壓(WCH)患病率為1.41%,明顯低于對照組的11.84%,差異有統計學意義(χ2=4.761,P<0.05)。 OBP測量指標比較中,從業護士組的OSBP、ODSP平均測量值分彆為(125.35±15.14),(76.15±9.67) mmHg,均明顯低于對照組的(131.71±16.62),(82.94±11.25)mmHg,差異有統計學意義(t分彆為2.418,3.907;P<0.05)。 ABPM鑑測指標比較中,從業護士組的24 h-mSBP、24 h-mDBP分彆為(127.34±13.46),(79.47±10.36)mmHg,均明顯高于對照組的(121.09±13.73),(75.82±9.18)mmHg,差異有統計學意義(t分彆為2.781,2.261;P<0.05)。dSBP、dDBP、nSBP、nDBP測量值和負荷值均明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(t分彆為2.918,3.284,2.547,3.544,2.864,2.561,2.623,2.837;P<0.05)。結論大醫院臨床護理單元從業護士群體ABPM各類鑑測指標及血壓負荷值較高,OBP測量值較低,併存在著MH患病率增加現象。
목적:분석삼급갑등의원림상호리단원종업호사진실혈압(OBP)급동태혈압(ABPM)감측수거。방법선택삼가2012년춘계체검적요녕성인민의원화요녕성금추의원림상과실종업호사71명위분석대상,대조조위76명동기삼가건강체검적모사업단위녀직공。전부입선대상균접수료OBP화24 h-ABPM검측。결과종업호사조적은성고혈압(MH)환병솔위14.08%,명현고우대조조적2.63%,차이유통계학의의(χ2=6.423,P<0.05),이백대의고혈압(WCH)환병솔위1.41%,명현저우대조조적11.84%,차이유통계학의의(χ2=4.761,P<0.05)。 OBP측량지표비교중,종업호사조적OSBP、ODSP평균측량치분별위(125.35±15.14),(76.15±9.67) mmHg,균명현저우대조조적(131.71±16.62),(82.94±11.25)mmHg,차이유통계학의의(t분별위2.418,3.907;P<0.05)。 ABPM감측지표비교중,종업호사조적24 h-mSBP、24 h-mDBP분별위(127.34±13.46),(79.47±10.36)mmHg,균명현고우대조조적(121.09±13.73),(75.82±9.18)mmHg,차이유통계학의의(t분별위2.781,2.261;P<0.05)。dSBP、dDBP、nSBP、nDBP측량치화부하치균명현고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(t분별위2.918,3.284,2.547,3.544,2.864,2.561,2.623,2.837;P<0.05)。결론대의원림상호리단원종업호사군체ABPM각류감측지표급혈압부하치교고,OBP측량치교저,병존재착MH환병솔증가현상。
Objective To analyze the office blood pressure ( OBP ) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) among clinical nurses in large hospitals .Methods Totals of 71 clinical nurses from large hospitals of Liaoning provincial were recruited as analysis objects .And 76 female staffs from other institutions took part in the Physical Check-up during the same time were recruited as control group .All the recruited objects received the office blood pressure ( OBP ) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ( ABPM ) . Results The prevalence of masked hypertension ( MH) in clinical nurses was higherthan that in control group (14.08%vs 2.63%,χ2 =6.423,P<0.05).The prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) in clinical nurses was lower than that in control group (1.41% vs 11.84%,χ2 =4.761,P<0.05).The mean value of OSBP,ODSP of clinical nurses was significantly lower than that of control group [OSBP :(125.35 ±15.14) vs (131.71 ±16.62),t=2.418,P<0.05;ODSP:(76.15 ±9.67) vs (82.94 ±11.25),t=3.907,P<0.05)]. The measured value of 24h-mSBP(127.34 ±13.46) vs (121.09 ±13.73),24h-mDBP(79.47 ±10.36) vs (75.82 ±9.18),dSBP,dDBP,nSBP,nDBP and loading value of dSBP ,dDBP,nSBP,nDBP of clinical nurses were significantly higher than those of control group (t =2.781,2.261,2.918,3.284,2.547,3.544,2.864, 2.561,2.623,2.837,respectively;P <0.05).Conclusions Among clinical nurses from large hospitals, measured value and loading value of ABPM were higher , OBP was lower and MH prevalence was increasing .