现代消化及介入诊疗
現代消化及介入診療
현대소화급개입진료
MODERN DIGESTION & INTERVENTION
2013年
3期
152-154
,共3页
宋学萍%杨俊%陈羽青%项薇%潘速跃
宋學萍%楊俊%陳羽青%項薇%潘速躍
송학평%양준%진우청%항미%반속약
焦虑抑郁症%功能性消化不良%帕罗西汀
焦慮抑鬱癥%功能性消化不良%帕囉西汀
초필억욱증%공능성소화불량%파라서정
Anxiety and depression%Functional dyspepsia%Paroxetine
目的探讨焦虑抑郁症患者并功能性消化不良的药物干预治疗及临床疗效分析。方法收集2012年4月至2013年1月在我院门诊或住院部病例125例,随机分为A组(治疗组)、B组(对照组),A组62例、B组63例,两组根据焦虑抑郁量表评分值再分为两个亚组:轻中度组、重度组。A组给予帕罗西汀治疗;B组给予帕罗西汀+奥美拉唑肠溶胶囊、莫沙必利治疗,分别于药物治疗后1、2、3月进行对比分析。结果焦虑抑郁症状呈轻中度病例,药物治疗后各时间点A、B组间有效率差别无统计学意义,P>0.05;而同组不同时间点有效率比较差别有统计学意义,P<0.05。焦虑抑郁症状呈重度病例,药物治疗后两组间各时间点有效的差别无统计学意义P>0.05,而同组不同时间点有效率比较也无统计学差异P>0.05。结论单用抗焦虑抑郁药物帕罗西汀治疗焦虑抑郁症合并功能性消化不良的疗效等同于帕罗西汀联合奥美拉唑肠溶胶囊、莫沙必利的疗效。
目的探討焦慮抑鬱癥患者併功能性消化不良的藥物榦預治療及臨床療效分析。方法收集2012年4月至2013年1月在我院門診或住院部病例125例,隨機分為A組(治療組)、B組(對照組),A組62例、B組63例,兩組根據焦慮抑鬱量錶評分值再分為兩箇亞組:輕中度組、重度組。A組給予帕囉西汀治療;B組給予帕囉西汀+奧美拉唑腸溶膠囊、莫沙必利治療,分彆于藥物治療後1、2、3月進行對比分析。結果焦慮抑鬱癥狀呈輕中度病例,藥物治療後各時間點A、B組間有效率差彆無統計學意義,P>0.05;而同組不同時間點有效率比較差彆有統計學意義,P<0.05。焦慮抑鬱癥狀呈重度病例,藥物治療後兩組間各時間點有效的差彆無統計學意義P>0.05,而同組不同時間點有效率比較也無統計學差異P>0.05。結論單用抗焦慮抑鬱藥物帕囉西汀治療焦慮抑鬱癥閤併功能性消化不良的療效等同于帕囉西汀聯閤奧美拉唑腸溶膠囊、莫沙必利的療效。
목적탐토초필억욱증환자병공능성소화불량적약물간예치료급림상료효분석。방법수집2012년4월지2013년1월재아원문진혹주원부병례125례,수궤분위A조(치료조)、B조(대조조),A조62례、B조63례,량조근거초필억욱량표평분치재분위량개아조:경중도조、중도조。A조급여파라서정치료;B조급여파라서정+오미랍서장용효낭、막사필리치료,분별우약물치료후1、2、3월진행대비분석。결과초필억욱증상정경중도병례,약물치료후각시간점A、B조간유효솔차별무통계학의의,P>0.05;이동조불동시간점유효솔비교차별유통계학의의,P<0.05。초필억욱증상정중도병례,약물치료후량조간각시간점유효적차별무통계학의의P>0.05,이동조불동시간점유효솔비교야무통계학차이P>0.05。결론단용항초필억욱약물파라서정치료초필억욱증합병공능성소화불량적료효등동우파라서정연합오미랍서장용효낭、막사필리적료효。
Objective To study the clinical effects of paroxetine on anxiety and depression in patients with functional dyspepsia. Methods One hundred and twenty-five patients were collected between April 2012 and Jan 2013. The patients were divided into two groups: treatment group (group A) and control group (group B). Based on the score value of anxiety and depression scale, each group was further divided into two sub-groups:mild or moderate group, and severe group. The patients in group A were treated with paroxetine, and in group B were treated with paroxetine,omeprazole, and mosapride. The clinical effects were analyzed at 1, 2, and 3 months after medicines were given. Results The effective rates on anxiety and depression of mild or moderate cases were no statistically significant differences between two groups (P>0.05), but between differ-ent time points the effective rates are statistically significant differences with P<0.05. And the effective rates of severe cases wre no statistically significant differences between two groups at different time points (P >0.05). Conclusion The effective rates are the same between two treatment groups on anxiety and depression in patients with functional dyspepsia.