CAJ | 학술논문

目的观察对比两种根充材料Vitapex、氧化锌丁香油糊剂用于治疗乳牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎的疗效。方法选择2010年1月-2012年12月间于我院口腔科门诊就诊的125例共148颗窦道型乳牙根尖周炎病例，随机分为治疗组（选用Vitapex作为根充糊剂）78颗患牙和对照组（选用氧化锌丁香油糊剂作为根充糊剂）70颗患牙行根管治疗,并于术后追踪观察6个月，比较2组的疗效。结果治疗组成功率为93.59%，对照组成功率为80.00%，2组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论治疗乳牙窦道型慢性根尖周炎，Vitapex糊剂比氧化锌丁香油糊剂效果更为显著，具有方便、快捷、术后不良反应轻等优点，值得临床推广应用。
목적관찰대비량충근충재료Vitapex、양화자정향유호제용우치료유아두도형만성근첨주염적료효。방법선택2010년1월-2012년12월간우아원구강과문진취진적125례공148과두도형유아근첨주염병례，수궤분위치료조（선용Vitapex작위근충호제）78과환아화대조조（선용양화자정향유호제작위근충호제）70과환아행근관치료,병우술후추종관찰6개월，비교2조적료효。결과치료조성공솔위93.59%，대조조성공솔위80.00%，2조비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론치료유아두도형만성근첨주염，Vitapex호제비양화자정향유호제효과경위현저，구유방편、쾌첩、술후불량반응경등우점，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of two root canal pastes in the treatment of deciduous teeth sinus chronic periapical apical abscess. Methods The treatment of 125 cases of a total of 148 sinus deciduous teeth periapical cases,collected in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2012,were randomly divided into treatment group (optional vitepax as a root canal sealers) and control group (optional zinc oxide eugenol paste as a root canal sealers). There are 74 teeth in root canal treatment in each group. Follow-up observation of six months , the efficacy of two groups were compared. Results The success rate of treatment group is 93.59%, while the other`s is 80.00%. There were statistically significant difference between Vitapex group and zinc oxide eugenol paste group in short-time clinical effect(P<0.05).Conclusion Vitapex shows more significant efficacy than zinc oxide eugenol paste in treating deciduous teeth sinus chronic periapical.