中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2013年
26期
58-59
,共2页
根管%根尖周病%远期疗效
根管%根尖週病%遠期療效
근관%근첨주병%원기료효
Root canal%Periapical disease%The forward curative effect
目的：探讨根管治疗术在根尖周病治疗中的应用及其远期疗效。方法：将本院收治的128例根尖周病患者随机分为观察组与对照组，每组64例，其中观察组采取一次性根管治疗术，对照组采取常规多次性根管治疗术，比较两组患者治疗后的临床疗效及远期疗效。结果：观察组治疗总有效率为91.55%，对照组为89.04%，两组比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；观察组根充后6个月总有效率为90.14%，1年为87.32%，2年为84.51%，对照组分别为87.67%、86.30%、83.56%，两组同期比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；同时两组治疗后2年与本组治疗后6个月、1年相比，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：根管治疗术治疗根尖周病即期及远期疗效均显著，而一次性根管治疗术能明显降低就诊次数，缩短疗程，值得临床推广应用。
目的：探討根管治療術在根尖週病治療中的應用及其遠期療效。方法：將本院收治的128例根尖週病患者隨機分為觀察組與對照組，每組64例，其中觀察組採取一次性根管治療術，對照組採取常規多次性根管治療術，比較兩組患者治療後的臨床療效及遠期療效。結果：觀察組治療總有效率為91.55%，對照組為89.04%，兩組比較差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）；觀察組根充後6箇月總有效率為90.14%，1年為87.32%，2年為84.51%，對照組分彆為87.67%、86.30%、83.56%，兩組同期比較差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）；同時兩組治療後2年與本組治療後6箇月、1年相比，差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）。結論：根管治療術治療根尖週病即期及遠期療效均顯著，而一次性根管治療術能明顯降低就診次數，縮短療程，值得臨床推廣應用。
목적：탐토근관치료술재근첨주병치료중적응용급기원기료효。방법：장본원수치적128례근첨주병환자수궤분위관찰조여대조조，매조64례，기중관찰조채취일차성근관치료술，대조조채취상규다차성근관치료술，비교량조환자치료후적림상료효급원기료효。결과：관찰조치료총유효솔위91.55%，대조조위89.04%，량조비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；관찰조근충후6개월총유효솔위90.14%，1년위87.32%，2년위84.51%，대조조분별위87.67%、86.30%、83.56%，량조동기비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；동시량조치료후2년여본조치료후6개월、1년상비，차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。결론：근관치료술치료근첨주병즉기급원기료효균현저，이일차성근관치료술능명현강저취진차수，축단료정，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective:To investigate application and the forward curative effect of the root canal therapy in treatment of periapical disease. Method:128 cases of periapical disease were randomly divided into observation group and control group,64 cases in each group,the observation group takes one-off root canal therapy,the control group adopted routine repeatedly,root canal treatment,compared two groups of patients after treatment of clinical curative effect and the forward curative effect.Result:Observation group treatment the total effective rate was 91.55%,control group was 89.04%, compared two groups there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05);6 months following observation group the total effective rate was 90.14%, 87.32%1 year,2 years was 84.51%,control group were 87.67%,86.30%,83.56%,during the same period there was no statistically significant difference comparing the two groups(P>0.05);At the same time the two groups after treatment for 2 years and 6 months after treatment,1 year,there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion:For the treatment of root canal therapy on periapical disease spot and the forward curative effect significantly,and one-off root canal therapy can significantly reduce the number of visits,shorten the treatment course,worthy of clinical popularization and application.
