CAJ | 학술논문

新的立法虽然使暂缓起诉的司法实践正当化，但并不意味着检察官一定以学者满意的方式适用附条件不起诉制度。司法者享有很大的自由裁量权，学者不能够通过法律确定自己的主张能够被检察官采纳。学者在完善适用条件、建立救济机制、改革执行人员、分清与相对不起诉的逻辑关系以及提升学者影响力方面困难重重。面对立法后在附条件不起诉问题上的距离，司法者需妥当适用附条件不起诉制度，在教育少年犯与维护社会公平正义之间寻求一个恰当的平衡点；司法者与学者应保持有效沟通，使学者倡导的教育至上理念能被司法者接受，司法者作出的合理的附条件不起诉决定获得学说的支持；司法机关应以看得见的方式实现公平正义，如公布附条件不起诉的理由和考察方式，增强公民的知情权和参与权。
신적입법수연사잠완기소적사법실천정당화，단병불의미착검찰관일정이학자만의적방식괄용부조건불기소제도。사법자향유흔대적자유재량권，학자불능구통과법률학정자기적주장능구피검찰관채납。학자재완선괄용조건、건립구제궤제、개혁집행인원、분청여상대불기소적라집관계이급제승학자영향력방면곤난중중。면대입법후재부조건불기소문제상적거리，사법자수타당괄용부조건불기소제도，재교육소년범여유호사회공평정의지간심구일개흡당적평형점；사법자여학자응보지유효구통，사학자창도적교육지상이념능피사법자접수，사법자작출적합리적부조건불기소결정획득학설적지지；사법궤관응이간득견적방식실현공평정의，여공포부조건불기소적이유화고찰방식，증강공민적지정권화삼여권。
Although the new legislation justifies the deferred prosecution practice , it does not necessarily mean that prosecutors will practice the conditional non-prosecution system in a way that satisfies scholars .Prosecutors are en-tailed with considerable discretionary power , so that scholars are afraid that their proposals will not be adopted in prac-tice.Scholars face challenges regarding modifying the conditions of applying conditional non -prosecution , establishing the remedy system , reforming the executors , clarifying the logical relation between conditional non-prosecution and relative non-prosecution as well as raising the scholars ’ influence .To deal with the distance in conditional non-prose-cution after the legislation , judiciaries should apply conditional non-prosecution properly , pursuing balance between educating the juvenile criminals and maintaining the society ’ s justice; judiciaries and scholars should communicate efficiently , so that the education priority idea which scholars advocate can be accepted by judiciaries , and the proper decision regarding conditional non-prosecution by judiciaries can be approved by scholars; the judicial authority should pursue justice under supervision , such as publishing the reasons and the ways of applying conditional non -pros-ecution , and enhancing the citizens ’ right to know and to participate in .