CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨湿润烧伤膏治疗烧烫伤的临床效果。方法选择2012年1月～2014年1月收治的烧烫伤患者60例为研究对象，应用随机数字表将60例患者分为观察组和对照组各30例，在予以对症治疗及清创处理后，观察组予湿润烧伤膏外敷，对照组予磺胺嘧啶银悬浊液外涂，比较两组的止痛效果、患者治疗期间的痛苦情况及创面愈合时间情况。结果观察组患者的止痛总有效率达90.0%，其止痛效果明显优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（90.0%vs 60.0%，P＜0.05）。观察组患者治疗期间痛苦程度明显轻于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。观察组患者的浅Ⅱ度、深Ⅱ度、Ⅲ度创面愈合时间明显短于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论湿润烧伤膏治疗烧烫伤，能止痛，减轻患者疼痛，缩短创面愈合时间，值得推广和应用。
목적：탐토습윤소상고치료소탕상적림상효과。방법선택2012년1월～2014년1월수치적소탕상환자60례위연구대상，응용수궤수자표장60례환자분위관찰조화대조조각30례，재여이대증치료급청창처리후，관찰조여습윤소상고외부，대조조여광알밀정은현탁액외도，비교량조적지통효과、환자치료기간적통고정황급창면유합시간정황。결과관찰조환자적지통총유효솔체90.0%，기지통효과명현우우대조조，차이유통계학의의（90.0%vs 60.0%，P＜0.05）。관찰조환자치료기간통고정도명현경우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。관찰조환자적천Ⅱ도、심Ⅱ도、Ⅲ도창면유합시간명현단우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론습윤소상고치료소탕상，능지통，감경환자동통，축단창면유합시간，치득추엄화응용。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect MEBO in treatment of burns. Methods A total of 60 patients were selected as the objects from Jan 2012 to Jan 2014, and were divided into observation group and control group ac-cording to random number table, each of 30 cases, the observation group treated with MEBO, while the control group treated with a topical silver sulfadiazine, the analgesic effect, pain conditions and treatment of patients during wound healing time situation were compared. Results The total effective rate of observation group was 90.0%, the analgesic effect was significantly better than the control group (90.0% vs 60.0%, P <0.05). The degree of pain during the treat-ment of patients in the observation group was significantly lighter than the control group (P <0.05). Shallow observation group Ⅱ patients, deep Ⅱ degree, degree Ⅲ wound healing time was significantly shorter than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion MEBO in treating patients with burns conducive pain, can reduce pain, shorten healing time, worthy of promotion and application.