中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2013年
16期
55-56
,共2页
产房%医护%助产士%职业暴露%血源传播%防护
產房%醫護%助產士%職業暴露%血源傳播%防護
산방%의호%조산사%직업폭로%혈원전파%방호
Maternity ward%Health care%Midwife%Occupational exposure%Blood transmission%Protection
目的探讨产房医务人员血源性传播性疾病职业暴露的风险和相关防护措施。方法选取我市产房工作人员146名，包括医生41名、助产士76名、实习医生10名和实习助产士19名。对其进行问卷调查，了解针刺事件发生率、相关知识培训情况以及防护用品使用情况等。结果工龄超过20年者1年内发生针刺事件几率明显低于其他工作人员，工龄为10～20年者虽然针刺事件发生率明显高于工龄＞20年者，但是与工龄＜10年的医务人员和实习生相比，仍然明显较低。上述比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。医护人员接受防护相关培训情况差别不大，无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。但是助产士使用防护用品情况明显优于医生，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论产房医务人员无论工龄长短，也无论岗位如何，都应按照相关流程进行操作，合理使用防护用具，减少暴露于血源性传播性疾病中的几率。
目的探討產房醫務人員血源性傳播性疾病職業暴露的風險和相關防護措施。方法選取我市產房工作人員146名，包括醫生41名、助產士76名、實習醫生10名和實習助產士19名。對其進行問捲調查，瞭解針刺事件髮生率、相關知識培訓情況以及防護用品使用情況等。結果工齡超過20年者1年內髮生針刺事件幾率明顯低于其他工作人員，工齡為10～20年者雖然針刺事件髮生率明顯高于工齡＞20年者，但是與工齡＜10年的醫務人員和實習生相比，仍然明顯較低。上述比較差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。醫護人員接受防護相關培訓情況差彆不大，無統計學意義（P＞0.05）。但是助產士使用防護用品情況明顯優于醫生，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論產房醫務人員無論工齡長短，也無論崗位如何，都應按照相關流程進行操作，閤理使用防護用具，減少暴露于血源性傳播性疾病中的幾率。
목적탐토산방의무인원혈원성전파성질병직업폭로적풍험화상관방호조시。방법선취아시산방공작인원146명，포괄의생41명、조산사76명、실습의생10명화실습조산사19명。대기진행문권조사，료해침자사건발생솔、상관지식배훈정황이급방호용품사용정황등。결과공령초과20년자1년내발생침자사건궤솔명현저우기타공작인원，공령위10～20년자수연침자사건발생솔명현고우공령＞20년자，단시여공령＜10년적의무인원화실습생상비，잉연명현교저。상술비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。의호인원접수방호상관배훈정황차별불대，무통계학의의（P＞0.05）。단시조산사사용방호용품정황명현우우의생，량조비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론산방의무인원무론공령장단，야무론강위여하，도응안조상관류정진행조작，합리사용방호용구，감소폭로우혈원성전파성질병중적궤솔。
Objective To explore the occupational exposure risk for delivery staff blood source sexually transmitted disease and related protection measures. Methods 146 staffs in the delivery room were chosen, including 41 doctors, 76 nurse midwifery, 10 interns and 19intern midwifery. They were taken with questionnaire survey to understand the acupuncture eents and related knowledge training, and protective equipment usage. Results The length of service within 1 year for more than 20 years of acupuncture event probability was significantly lower than the other staff, length of service for the 10-20 years acupuncture event rates were significantly higher than the length of service>20 years, but with a length of <10 years compared to the medical staff and interns, was significantly lower. The comparative difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Trained medical personnel protection related condition difference was not significant, and there was no statistical significance (P > 0.05). But the application of protective equipment for the midwife was superior to the doctor, compared between the two groups, and there was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Maternity ward staff regardless of length of service, no matter what jobs should be carried out in accordance with the relevant process operation, rational use of protective equipment to reduce the blood source risk of sexually transmitted diseases.
