天然气化工
天然氣化工
천연기화공
NATURAL GAS CHEMICAL INDUSTRY
2013年
4期
6-10
,共5页
刘军%孟凡会%钟朋展%吉可明%李忠
劉軍%孟凡會%鐘朋展%吉可明%李忠
류군%맹범회%종붕전%길가명%리충
煤制天然气%镍基催化剂%γ-Al2O3%低温浆态床%一氧化碳%甲烷化
煤製天然氣%鎳基催化劑%γ-Al2O3%低溫漿態床%一氧化碳%甲烷化
매제천연기%얼기최화제%γ-Al2O3%저온장태상%일양화탄%갑완화
SNG%nickel-based catalyst%gamma-alumina%low temperature slurry reactor%carbon monoxide%methanation
采用等体积浸渍法制备了4种不同γ-Al2O3为载体的负载型Ni-Fe/γ-Al2O3催化剂,通过BET、XRD和H2-TPR等表征手段对载体和催化剂进行了表面微观结构分析,并考察了其低温浆态床催化CO甲烷化反应的活性和稳定性。结果表明,载体γ-Al2O3的表面织构性质对Ni-Fe/γ-Al2O3催化剂活性物质Ni的分布和甲烷化活性影响较大。比表面积和平均孔径分别为192m2/g和5.8nm的γ-Al2O3载体具有较好的低温浆态床CO甲烷化活性,有利于活性组分的分散,且与γ-Al2O3表面作用较强的β-NiO含量较多,还原后活性物质Ni晶粒较小,形成的活性中心数量多,甲烷化活性及稳定性较好,CO的平均转化率和CH4平均选择性分别达到97.0%和89.0%。而以比表面积较大的高硅γ-Al2O3载体制备的催化剂,游离态α-NiO含量较多,还原过程中容易迁移和团聚,形成较大的Ni晶粒,催化剂的活性和稳定性均差,CO的初始转化率为85.5%,反应17h后活性急剧下降。
採用等體積浸漬法製備瞭4種不同γ-Al2O3為載體的負載型Ni-Fe/γ-Al2O3催化劑,通過BET、XRD和H2-TPR等錶徵手段對載體和催化劑進行瞭錶麵微觀結構分析,併攷察瞭其低溫漿態床催化CO甲烷化反應的活性和穩定性。結果錶明,載體γ-Al2O3的錶麵織構性質對Ni-Fe/γ-Al2O3催化劑活性物質Ni的分佈和甲烷化活性影響較大。比錶麵積和平均孔徑分彆為192m2/g和5.8nm的γ-Al2O3載體具有較好的低溫漿態床CO甲烷化活性,有利于活性組分的分散,且與γ-Al2O3錶麵作用較彊的β-NiO含量較多,還原後活性物質Ni晶粒較小,形成的活性中心數量多,甲烷化活性及穩定性較好,CO的平均轉化率和CH4平均選擇性分彆達到97.0%和89.0%。而以比錶麵積較大的高硅γ-Al2O3載體製備的催化劑,遊離態α-NiO含量較多,還原過程中容易遷移和糰聚,形成較大的Ni晶粒,催化劑的活性和穩定性均差,CO的初始轉化率為85.5%,反應17h後活性急劇下降。
채용등체적침지법제비료4충불동γ-Al2O3위재체적부재형Ni-Fe/γ-Al2O3최화제,통과BET、XRD화H2-TPR등표정수단대재체화최화제진행료표면미관결구분석,병고찰료기저온장태상최화CO갑완화반응적활성화은정성。결과표명,재체γ-Al2O3적표면직구성질대Ni-Fe/γ-Al2O3최화제활성물질Ni적분포화갑완화활성영향교대。비표면적화평균공경분별위192m2/g화5.8nm적γ-Al2O3재체구유교호적저온장태상CO갑완화활성,유리우활성조분적분산,차여γ-Al2O3표면작용교강적β-NiO함량교다,환원후활성물질Ni정립교소,형성적활성중심수량다,갑완화활성급은정성교호,CO적평균전화솔화CH4평균선택성분별체도97.0%화89.0%。이이비표면적교대적고규γ-Al2O3재체제비적최화제,유리태α-NiO함량교다,환원과정중용역천이화단취,형성교대적Ni정립,최화제적활성화은정성균차,CO적초시전화솔위85.5%,반응17h후활성급극하강。
Ni-Fe/γ-Al2O3 catalysts with four different γ-Al2O3 supports were prepared by incipient impregnation and characterized by XRD, BET and H2-TPR. Catalytic behaviors of the catalysts for low-temperature CO methanation were investigated in a slurry reactor. The results showed that the surface texture properties of γ-Al2O3 supports had great impact on distribution of Ni reactive species and methanation activity. Moderate specific surface area (192m2/g) and pore size (5.8 nm) of γ-Al2O3 was favor for the dispersion of active component, resulting in a higher amount of β-NiO and smaller Ni crystal particle size, which increased active sites, thus having better methanation activity and stability, with a CO conversion of 97.0% and a CH 4 selectivity of 89.0%. However, the catalyst prepared by high silica γ-Al2O3 support with larger specific surface area contained a great amount of α-NiO, which was inclined to agglomerate in the reduction process, resulting in low catalytic activity and stability, with a CO initial conversion of 85.5%and rapid deactivation after 17 hours.