中南大学学报(医学版)
中南大學學報(醫學版)
중남대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCES)
2013年
8期
804-808
,共5页
许华山%陈胜喜%罗万俊%蒋海河
許華山%陳勝喜%囉萬俊%蔣海河
허화산%진성희%라만준%장해하
缺血预适应%皮质醇%依托咪酯
缺血預適應%皮質醇%依託咪酯
결혈예괄응%피질순%의탁미지
ischemic precondition%cortisol%etomidate
目的:探讨应激反应对心肌缺血预适应保护的影响。方法:30只家兔随机分为5组:缺血预适应组(IPC组)、缺血再灌注组(IR组)、依托咪酯组(Etom组)、甲基强的松龙组(MP组)和假手术组(Sham组),以心肌梗死面积/缺血面积、血清肌酸激酶(CK)活性、肌钙蛋白I (cTnI)浓度为检测指标,同时检测血清皮质醇动态变化。结果:IPC组、MP组、IR组、Etom组心肌梗死面积/缺血面积分别为(5.86±2.81)%,(11.28±3.62)%,(26.79±4.53)%,(18.19±3.72)%, CK活性分别增加(255±89),(314±160),(855±371),(768±404) U/L,cTnI增高值分别为(3.6±0.6),(6.1±2.2),(8.1±3.6),(6.4±1.6)μg/L。各指标组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),Etom组皮质醇反应明显钝化。结论:钝化皮质醇反应可明显削弱IPC的保护作用,甲基强的松龙有一定程度的心肌保护作用,提示IPC保护作用中可能有应激反应参与。
目的:探討應激反應對心肌缺血預適應保護的影響。方法:30隻傢兔隨機分為5組:缺血預適應組(IPC組)、缺血再灌註組(IR組)、依託咪酯組(Etom組)、甲基彊的鬆龍組(MP組)和假手術組(Sham組),以心肌梗死麵積/缺血麵積、血清肌痠激酶(CK)活性、肌鈣蛋白I (cTnI)濃度為檢測指標,同時檢測血清皮質醇動態變化。結果:IPC組、MP組、IR組、Etom組心肌梗死麵積/缺血麵積分彆為(5.86±2.81)%,(11.28±3.62)%,(26.79±4.53)%,(18.19±3.72)%, CK活性分彆增加(255±89),(314±160),(855±371),(768±404) U/L,cTnI增高值分彆為(3.6±0.6),(6.1±2.2),(8.1±3.6),(6.4±1.6)μg/L。各指標組間比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05),Etom組皮質醇反應明顯鈍化。結論:鈍化皮質醇反應可明顯削弱IPC的保護作用,甲基彊的鬆龍有一定程度的心肌保護作用,提示IPC保護作用中可能有應激反應參與。
목적:탐토응격반응대심기결혈예괄응보호적영향。방법:30지가토수궤분위5조:결혈예괄응조(IPC조)、결혈재관주조(IR조)、의탁미지조(Etom조)、갑기강적송룡조(MP조)화가수술조(Sham조),이심기경사면적/결혈면적、혈청기산격매(CK)활성、기개단백I (cTnI)농도위검측지표,동시검측혈청피질순동태변화。결과:IPC조、MP조、IR조、Etom조심기경사면적/결혈면적분별위(5.86±2.81)%,(11.28±3.62)%,(26.79±4.53)%,(18.19±3.72)%, CK활성분별증가(255±89),(314±160),(855±371),(768±404) U/L,cTnI증고치분별위(3.6±0.6),(6.1±2.2),(8.1±3.6),(6.4±1.6)μg/L。각지표조간비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05),Etom조피질순반응명현둔화。결론:둔화피질순반응가명현삭약IPC적보호작용,갑기강적송룡유일정정도적심기보호작용,제시IPC보호작용중가능유응격반응삼여。
Objective:To determine the role of stress in myocardial protection of ischemic preconditioning (IPC). <br> Methods:hTirty rabbits were randomly divided into an IPC group, an etomidate (Etom) group, an ischemic/reperfusion (IR) group, a methylprednisolone (MP) group and a sham group. hTe ratio of infarction size versus risk area (infarct/risk) was calculated. hTe elevations of the serum creatine kinase (CK) activity and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) concentrations as well as the serum cortisol concentrations were measured. <br> Results:hTe percentages of infarct/risk in the IPC group, the MP group, the IR group, and the Etom group were (5.86±2.81)%, (11.28±3.62)%, (26.79±4.53)%, and (18.19±3.72)%, respectively. The elevations of the serum CK activity in the IPC group, the MP group, the IR group, and the Etom group were (255±89), (314±160), (855±371), and (768±404) U/L, respectively. hTe elevations of serum cTnI concentrations in the IPC group, the MP group, the IR group, and the Etom group were (3.6±0.6),(6.1±2.2), (8.1±3.6), and (6.4±1.6)μg/L, respectively. Those indicators among the groups were signiifcantly different (P<0.05). Cortisol reaction was markedly diminished in the Etom group. <br> Conclusion: A blunted cortisol reaction can markedly reduce the benefit of IPC while methylprednisolone shows cardioprotective effects, suggesting that stress might be involved in the myocardial protection of IPC.