CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较超声与核磁共振对乳腺癌的临床诊断价值.方法对乳腺疾病患者分别进行超声与核磁共振检查,并以术后病理检查结果为诊断标准,对两种影像学检查诊断准确率进行对比分析.结果核磁共振对乳腺癌的诊断正确率(86.9％)明显高于超声诊断正确率(39.3％),灵敏度及特异度也明显高于超声诊断,漏诊率和误诊率明显低于超声诊断,差异均有统计学意义(x2=6.583、12.573、4.892、23.175、8.649,均P＜0.05).结论超声与核磁共振对乳腺癌影像学诊断均有较高的诊断能力,核磁共振诊断的效能更具有优势,但超声操作方便、可重复检查,可以作为门诊筛查使用.
목적 비교초성여핵자공진대유선암적림상진단개치.방법 대유선질병환자분별진행초성여핵자공진검사,병이술후병리검사결과위진단표준,대량충영상학검사진단준학솔진행대비분석.결과 핵자공진대유선암적진단정학솔(86.9％)명현고우초성진단정학솔(39.3％),령민도급특이도야명현고우초성진단,루진솔화오진솔명현저우초성진단,차이균유통계학의의(x2=6.583、12.573、4.892、23.175、8.649,균P＜0.05).결론 초성여핵자공진대유선암영상학진단균유교고적진단능력,핵자공진진단적효능경구유우세,단초성조작방편、가중복검사,가이작위문진사사사용.
Objective To compare the clinical diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer.Methods Ultrasound and MRI were performed in patients with breast disease.The postoperative pathological examination results were seemed as diagnostic criteria.The diagnostic accuracy was analyzed in two kinds of imaging examination.Results The diagnostic accuracy of MRI in breast cancer(86.9％) was significantly higher than the accuracy of ultrasonic diagnosis(39.3％),the sensitivity and specificity of MRI were significantly higher than those in ultrasonic diagnosis,the rate of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis rate of MRI were lower than those of ultrasonic diagnosis,the differences were statistically significant (x2 =6.583,12.573,4.892,23.175,8.649,all P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound and MRI have high ability in diagnosis of breast cancer.MRI diagnostic efficacy has more advantages,but the ultrasound is convenient to operate and repeate inspection,can be used in screening.