CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察不同取穴治疗脑卒中后足内翻的疗效。方法：对80例符合标准的脑卒中后足内翻患者，随机分成独取足少阳经穴组和常规取穴组，每组40例。每日治疗1次，10次为一疗程，疗程之间间隔2天，连续治疗3个疗程。两组均在治疗前后以Fugl-Meyer运动功能评分量表及修订的Barthel指数评分量表为指标进行疗效评定。结果：两组自身在治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。治疗3个疗程后，独取足少阳经穴组的Fugl-Meyer运动功能评分、Barthel指数评分改善明显优于常规针法组，比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。结论：两种针法均能改善脑卒中后足内翻患者的运动功能及生活能力，且独取足少阳经穴组见效快，疗效更优。
목적：관찰불동취혈치료뇌졸중후족내번적료효。방법：대80례부합표준적뇌졸중후족내번환자，수궤분성독취족소양경혈조화상규취혈조，매조40례。매일치료1차，10차위일료정，료정지간간격2천，련속치료3개료정。량조균재치료전후이Fugl-Meyer운동공능평분량표급수정적Barthel지수평분량표위지표진행료효평정。결과：량조자신재치료전후비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0．05）。치료3개료정후，독취족소양경혈조적Fugl-Meyer운동공능평분、Barthel지수평분개선명현우우상규침법조，비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0．05）。결론：량충침법균능개선뇌졸중후족내번환자적운동공능급생활능력，차독취족소양경혈조견효쾌，료효경우。
Objective:To observe the curative effect of different choice of acupoints for strephenopodia after stroke .Method s:80 patients with strephenopodia after stroke were randomly divided into Foot -Shaoyang me-ridian group and routine acupoint group , with 40 patients in each group .Both groups were treated once each day, 10 times as a single therapeutic course , after two days interval start another course ,three courses in all. Before and after treatment , we observed curative effect in both groups by Fugl -Meyer motor function rating scale and revised Barthel index scale .Results:Each group had differences before and after treatment and there was a statistical significance ( P<0 .05 ) .After three courses of treatment , Fugl-Meyer motor scores and Bar-thel Index scores were both improved significantly in Foot -Shaoyang meridian group compared with routine acupoint group , and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0 .05 ) .Conclusion:Both therapies can im-prove motor function and living ability of stroke patients ,and foot-Shaoyang meridian group has a better efficacy .