CAJ | 학술논문

章学诚作为一位科举应试的成功者和多年任职于书院的科举教育塾师，其对科举时文的教学有深刻的实践体会，并形成了其独到的见解。他认为时文与古文并不是绝对的对立，从文理上来说是相通的，并由此提出了时文与古文相互参照的文章观。其以经史学问为根本的时文创作观，以史学叙事文本为学文典范的思想，对于我们全面认识中国传统的文章学理论也有参考意义。
장학성작위일위과거응시적성공자화다년임직우서원적과거교육숙사，기대과거시문적교학유심각적실천체회，병형성료기독도적견해。타인위시문여고문병불시절대적대립，종문리상래설시상통적，병유차제출료시문여고문상호삼조적문장관。기이경사학문위근본적시문창작관，이사학서사문본위학문전범적사상，대우아문전면인식중국전통적문장학이론야유삼고의의。
As a winner in imperial examination of Qing dynasty and a senior teacher working in the a-cademy of classical learning for many years, Zhang Xuecheng had a profound experience of the educa-tion on imperial examination in Qing dynasty, which led to his unique insight into the essays prescribed for imperial examination. Zhang Xuecheng maintained that essay prescribed for imperial examination (which named "Popular Prose" for short, and in fact was“Eight-legged Essay”) wasn't completely oppo-site to "Ancient Prose"; instead, both Popular Prose and Ancient Prose were similar in unity and coher-ence in writing. So he put forward the theory that Popular Prose and Ancient Prose should be cross-ref-erenced. In general, Zhang Xuecheng thought that it was necessary to be based on knowledge of the Confucian classics and the history, and take the narrative texts in Chinese history books as examples, when writting the essays prescribed for imperial examination. To some extent, his thoughts had some reference meaning on studying Chinese traditional prose theory.