系统工程与电子技术
繫統工程與電子技術
계통공정여전자기술
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS
2014年
9期
1750-1754
,共5页
无人机%扫描线%区域覆盖%航迹规划%转弯航迹规划
無人機%掃描線%區域覆蓋%航跡規劃%轉彎航跡規劃
무인궤%소묘선%구역복개%항적규화%전만항적규화
unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV)%scanline%region coverage%flight path planning%turning path planning
针对无人机采用扫描线实现区域覆盖的方式中,未充分考虑无人机最小转弯半径的问题,提出了两种可行的转弯方式,即Ω形转弯和α形转弯,并对两种方式的转弯时机、半径和航迹进行了分析计算。理论分析证明:对于同一转弯方式,无人机的转弯半径越小则规划航迹越短;在相同条件下,无人机执行Ω形转弯的路径要少于α形转弯的路径。实例分析表明:当无人机最小转弯半径小于扫描线间隔的一半时,Ω形转弯优于常规半圆转弯方式,且无人机最小半径越小,Ω形转弯的路径越短;当最小转弯半径大于扫描线宽度的一半时,常规半圆转弯方式已不能满足需要,而Ω形转弯仍然有效。
針對無人機採用掃描線實現區域覆蓋的方式中,未充分攷慮無人機最小轉彎半徑的問題,提齣瞭兩種可行的轉彎方式,即Ω形轉彎和α形轉彎,併對兩種方式的轉彎時機、半徑和航跡進行瞭分析計算。理論分析證明:對于同一轉彎方式,無人機的轉彎半徑越小則規劃航跡越短;在相同條件下,無人機執行Ω形轉彎的路徑要少于α形轉彎的路徑。實例分析錶明:噹無人機最小轉彎半徑小于掃描線間隔的一半時,Ω形轉彎優于常規半圓轉彎方式,且無人機最小半徑越小,Ω形轉彎的路徑越短;噹最小轉彎半徑大于掃描線寬度的一半時,常規半圓轉彎方式已不能滿足需要,而Ω形轉彎仍然有效。
침대무인궤채용소묘선실현구역복개적방식중,미충분고필무인궤최소전만반경적문제,제출료량충가행적전만방식,즉Ω형전만화α형전만,병대량충방식적전만시궤、반경화항적진행료분석계산。이론분석증명:대우동일전만방식,무인궤적전만반경월소칙규화항적월단;재상동조건하,무인궤집행Ω형전만적로경요소우α형전만적로경。실례분석표명:당무인궤최소전만반경소우소묘선간격적일반시,Ω형전만우우상규반원전만방식,차무인궤최소반경월소,Ω형전만적로경월단;당최소전만반경대우소묘선관도적일반시,상규반원전만방식이불능만족수요,이Ω형전만잉연유효。
In flight path planning for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)by scanline to achieve region cover-age,the minimum turning radius is not fullly considered.To solve this problem,two feasible turning methods, which are named as Ω-turning andα-turning,are proposed.The turning occasion,radius and path are also ana-lyzed and calculated.Theoretical analysis shows that for the same turning method,the smaller the turning radi-us is,the shorter the UAV’s planning path is;under the same conditions,the path length of Ω-turning is less than that ofα-turning.Example shows that when the UAV’s minimum turning radius is less than half the spac-ing of the scanlines,the path length of Ω-turning is shorter than the path length of the conventional semi-circle turning;when the UAV’s minimum turning radius is greater than half the spacing of the scanlines,the conven-tional semi-circle turning is unavailable but Ω-turning is still effective.