国际病毒学杂志
國際病毒學雜誌
국제병독학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
2014年
4期
174-177
,共4页
高压氧%病毒性脑炎%后遗症
高壓氧%病毒性腦炎%後遺癥
고압양%병독성뇌염%후유증
High pressure oxygen%Viral encephalitis%Complications
目的 观察药物联合高压氧治疗对病毒性脑炎的疗效.方法 回顾性收集104例病毒性脑炎患者的临床资料.根据是否接受过高压氧治疗分为药物联合高压氧治疗组及单纯药物治疗组,比较两组患者的疗效和后遗症的发生率.结果 高压氧联合药物治疗组与单纯药物治疗组的有效率分别为96.4%(54/56)和87.5% (42/48),差异有统计学意义(X2 =8.36,P<0.05),后遗症的发生率分别为3.4%(2/56)和12.5%(6/48),差异有统计学意义(X2 =5.63,P<0.05).高压氧联合药物治疗组平均治愈为14.8天,单纯药物治疗组平均治愈时间为22.1天,两组差异有统计学意义(t=1.56,P<0.05).结论 高压氧联合药物治疗病毒性脑炎的效果优于单纯使用药物治疗.
目的 觀察藥物聯閤高壓氧治療對病毒性腦炎的療效.方法 迴顧性收集104例病毒性腦炎患者的臨床資料.根據是否接受過高壓氧治療分為藥物聯閤高壓氧治療組及單純藥物治療組,比較兩組患者的療效和後遺癥的髮生率.結果 高壓氧聯閤藥物治療組與單純藥物治療組的有效率分彆為96.4%(54/56)和87.5% (42/48),差異有統計學意義(X2 =8.36,P<0.05),後遺癥的髮生率分彆為3.4%(2/56)和12.5%(6/48),差異有統計學意義(X2 =5.63,P<0.05).高壓氧聯閤藥物治療組平均治愈為14.8天,單純藥物治療組平均治愈時間為22.1天,兩組差異有統計學意義(t=1.56,P<0.05).結論 高壓氧聯閤藥物治療病毒性腦炎的效果優于單純使用藥物治療.
목적 관찰약물연합고압양치료대병독성뇌염적료효.방법 회고성수집104례병독성뇌염환자적림상자료.근거시부접수과고압양치료분위약물연합고압양치료조급단순약물치료조,비교량조환자적료효화후유증적발생솔.결과 고압양연합약물치료조여단순약물치료조적유효솔분별위96.4%(54/56)화87.5% (42/48),차이유통계학의의(X2 =8.36,P<0.05),후유증적발생솔분별위3.4%(2/56)화12.5%(6/48),차이유통계학의의(X2 =5.63,P<0.05).고압양연합약물치료조평균치유위14.8천,단순약물치료조평균치유시간위22.1천,량조차이유통계학의의(t=1.56,P<0.05).결론 고압양연합약물치료병독성뇌염적효과우우단순사용약물치료.
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effects of high pressure oxygen (HPO) treatment combined with drugs to viral encephalitis (VE).Methods A total of 104 patients with VE were enrolled in this study.The clinical data of these patients were collected retrospectively.The participants were divided into two groups according to whether received HPO treatment.The therapeutic effects and the incidence of complications were compared between the combined treatment group and drug only group.Results The treatment efficiencies in combined treatment group and drug only group were 96.4% (54/56) and 87.5% (42/48),respectively.There was significant difference between them (P <0.05).The incidences of complications were 3.4% (2/56) and 12.5% (6/48) in combined treatment group and drug only treatment group,respectively and the difference was significant (P < 0.05).There was significant difference in the average healing times of both groups (14.8 days vs.22.1 days,P < 0.05).Conclusions The therapeutic effects of combined treatment were better than drug only treatment.