CAJ | 학술논문

目的对比研究阑尾炎患者实施腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术的临床效果，并进行总结分析。方法回顾性分析我院2012年2月～2013年2月收治的120例阑尾炎患者，随机分成实验组和对照组，各60例。实验组实施腹腔镜切除术，对照组实施传统的开腹手术治疗。对比两组手术时间、出血量、恢复时间、手术并发症，总结临床效果。结果实验组具有良好的临床效果。相比对照组恢复较快，且手术时间、出血量、抗生素的使用时长对比均有统计学意义。结论腹腔镜手术治疗阑尾炎具有良好的临床效果，其优点为手术视野清晰、出血量少、住院时间短、恢复快且并发症少，值得临床推广。
목적대비연구란미염환자실시복강경수술여전통개복수술적림상효과，병진행총결분석。방법회고성분석아원2012년2월～2013년2월수치적120례란미염환자，수궤분성실험조화대조조，각60례。실험조실시복강경절제술，대조조실시전통적개복수술치료。대비량조수술시간、출혈량、회복시간、수술병발증，총결림상효과。결과실험조구유량호적림상효과。상비대조조회복교쾌，차수술시간、출혈량、항생소적사용시장대비균유통계학의의。결론복강경수술치료란미염구유량호적림상효과，기우점위수술시야청석、출혈량소、주원시간단、회복쾌차병발증소，치득림상추엄。
Objective To study and summary the clinical effect of laparoscopic appendicitis and traditional open surgery. Methods 120 cases of appendicitis patients in our hospital from Febru-ary 2012 to February 2013 were randomly divided into the experimental group and control group, each group with 60 cases, the control group was treated with laparoscopic resection, the experi-mental group was treated with traditional open surgery. Two sets of final data were compared, in-cluding the operation time, blood loss, recovery time, complications, and clinical effect were sum-marized. Results Patients in experimental group after the implementation of laparoscopic surgery had good clinical effect. Compared with the control group, patients’ recovery was faster, and the length of the operation time, blood loss, length of time of using antibiotics had statistical signifi-cance. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery had good clinical effect, it had the advantages of more clear field, less blood loss, shorter hospitalization time, more rapid recovery and fewer complica-tions, therefore, it was worth clinical promotion.