CAJ | 학술논문

基于缓解交通拥堵等公共利益的考量，我国上海、北京、贵阳、广州等地政府相继颁布并实施“车辆限牌令”。由于“限牌令”限制了法院判决、裁定直接进行车辆过户的物权登记规定，藉此对法院的协助执行法律文书增设了车辆指标证明的条件，致使法院陷入强制执行之困境。“限牌令”的上述制度安排，从法理上说有不当立法、越权审查司法文书和增设行政许可之虞，同时其规制成本过高，因规避虚假诉讼而有因噎废食之过。在此背景下，有必要从完善人大的备案审查制度、确立法院的司法主体地位、畅通当事人诉讼的救济途径、启动行政诉讼的司法审查程序和建立行政立法的利益表达、意见沟通机制等五个方面对其进行梳理和整合，从困境中突围而出。
기우완해교통옹도등공공이익적고량，아국상해、북경、귀양、엄주등지정부상계반포병실시“차량한패령”。유우“한패령”한제료법원판결、재정직접진행차량과호적물권등기규정，자차대법원적협조집행법률문서증설료차량지표증명적조건，치사법원함입강제집행지곤경。“한패령”적상술제도안배，종법리상설유불당입법、월권심사사법문서화증설행정허가지우，동시기규제성본과고，인규피허가소송이유인일폐식지과。재차배경하，유필요종완선인대적비안심사제도、학입법원적사법주체지위、창통당사인소송적구제도경、계동행정소송적사법심사정서화건립행정입법적이익표체、의견구통궤제등오개방면대기진행소리화정합，종곤경중돌위이출。
Based on such public interests as easing traffic jams , the governments of Beijing , Shanghai , Guiyang , and Guangzhou promulgated and implemented the vehicle license limit order .License Restrictions restrains the court decision from directly trans-ferring vehicle ownership of property registration , and adds certification requirements of vehicle index to the assistance in execu-tion of legal documents , with the result that the dilemma of court enforcement occurs .From the perspective of jurisprudence , Li-cense Restrictions is in the danger of improper legislation , examining judicial documents beyond its power and additionally estab-lishing administrative license .Meanwhile , as its regulatory costs are too high and it has to escape false litigation , it makes a mis-take of throwing away the apple because of the core .Thus, it is necessary to break out from the dilemma of court enforcement by integrating the following five paths:improving the record review system of NPC , defining the dominant position of court , smoot-hing relief channel of litigation , starting up procedure for judicial review of administrative litigation , establishing interest expres-sion and communication mechanism of administrative legislation .