重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2013年
26期
3129-3130,3133
,共3页
根尖周炎%根管疗法%根尖周指数
根尖週炎%根管療法%根尖週指數
근첨주염%근관요법%근첨주지수
periapical periodontitis%root canal therapy%periapical index
目的对感染根管进行一次或多次性根管治疗,观察分析其术后疼痛及根尖周愈合情况,评价一次性根管治疗的临床应用。方法选取80例慢性根尖周炎患牙,一次组一次治疗完成根管预备和根管充填,与多次疗程[疗程间Ca(OH)2根管封药]完成根管治疗的患牙进行临床效果比较。主要临床指标有术后1周疼痛率、术后X线片及根尖周愈合率。结果患者术后1周疼痛率一次组为37.5%,多次组为35.0%,二者间差异无统计学意义( P>0.05),术后中重度疼痛的发生率均为15.0%,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。术后6个月根尖周愈合率一次组为81.6%,多次组为80.6%,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论感染根管一次性根管治疗的术后疼痛及根尖周愈合率与多次疗程差异无统计学意义,具备常规开展的临床可行性。
目的對感染根管進行一次或多次性根管治療,觀察分析其術後疼痛及根尖週愈閤情況,評價一次性根管治療的臨床應用。方法選取80例慢性根尖週炎患牙,一次組一次治療完成根管預備和根管充填,與多次療程[療程間Ca(OH)2根管封藥]完成根管治療的患牙進行臨床效果比較。主要臨床指標有術後1週疼痛率、術後X線片及根尖週愈閤率。結果患者術後1週疼痛率一次組為37.5%,多次組為35.0%,二者間差異無統計學意義( P>0.05),術後中重度疼痛的髮生率均為15.0%,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。術後6箇月根尖週愈閤率一次組為81.6%,多次組為80.6%,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論感染根管一次性根管治療的術後疼痛及根尖週愈閤率與多次療程差異無統計學意義,具備常規開展的臨床可行性。
목적대감염근관진행일차혹다차성근관치료,관찰분석기술후동통급근첨주유합정황,평개일차성근관치료적림상응용。방법선취80례만성근첨주염환아,일차조일차치료완성근관예비화근관충전,여다차료정[료정간Ca(OH)2근관봉약]완성근관치료적환아진행림상효과비교。주요림상지표유술후1주동통솔、술후X선편급근첨주유합솔。결과환자술후1주동통솔일차조위37.5%,다차조위35.0%,이자간차이무통계학의의( P>0.05),술후중중도동통적발생솔균위15.0%,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。술후6개월근첨주유합솔일차조위81.6%,다차조위80.6%,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론감염근관일차성근관치료적술후동통급근첨주유합솔여다차료정차이무통계학의의,구비상규개전적림상가행성。
Objective To conduct one-visit or multi-visit root canal treatment for infected root canals ,to observe and analyze the postoperative pain and the periapical healing status and to evaluate the clinical application of one -visit root canal therapy .Meth-ods 80 teeth diagnosed as chronic apical periodontitis were recruited .40 cases were included in one-visit root canal treatment group and the other 40 cases in multi-visit group with calcium hydroxide as an interapoinment medicament .Main clinical assessments in-cluded postoperative pain ,postoperative X ray and 6 months′periapical healing response .Results There there was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding postoperative pain (one-visit group 37 .5% ,multi-visit 35 .0% ,P>0 .05) and 6 months′periapical healing response(one-visit group 81 .6% ,multi-visit 80 .6% ,P>0 .05) .Conclusion One-visit root canal treat-ment has the same clinical effect(postoperative pain and periapical healing ) as multi-visit on infected root canals and has the clinical feasibility of routine use .