CAJ | 학술논문

目的列出蒲黄及其伪品的区别，为中药鉴定工作者提供鉴别蒲黄的依据。方法用水试、显微鉴别和理化鉴别的方法将蒲黄及其伪品进行比较。结果伪品“蒲黄”从性状、显微及一般理化性质与正品均不相同，薄层色谱的斑点与正品蒲黄的斑点位置，颜色均有很大差异。结论蒲黄与其伪品有非常巨大的差别，通过水试、显微鉴别或理化鉴别的方法都能轻易地鉴别出来。
목적렬출포황급기위품적구별，위중약감정공작자제공감별포황적의거。방법용수시、현미감별화이화감별적방법장포황급기위품진행비교。결과위품“포황”종성상、현미급일반이화성질여정품균불상동，박층색보적반점여정품포황적반점위치，안색균유흔대차이。결론포황여기위품유비상거대적차별，통과수시、현미감별혹이화감별적방법도능경역지감별출래。
Objective To distinguish lists of pol en Typhae and its adulterants, provide the basis for the identification of pol en Typhae Worker Identification of Chinese medicine. Methods The water test, microscopic identification and physicochemical identification method wil compare pol en Typhae and its adulterants. Results The fake"pol en"from the characters, microscopic and physicochemical propertiesand quality are not the same, speckled with genuine pol en Typhae TLC spots position, dif erent colors are. Conclusion There is very big difference between pol en Typhae and its adulterants, through water test, microscopic identification and physicochemical identification can be easily identified.