中国实用口腔科杂志
中國實用口腔科雜誌
중국실용구강과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL STOMATOLOGY
2013年
7期
425-427
,共3页
陈觉清%段昌华%邹康元%邓向东
陳覺清%段昌華%鄒康元%鄧嚮東
진각청%단창화%추강원%산향동
自酸蚀黏结剂%微渗漏%氧化锆%嵌体
自痠蝕黏結劑%微滲漏%氧化鋯%嵌體
자산식점결제%미삼루%양화고%감체
self-etching bonding agent%microleakage%zirconium oxide%inlay
目的评价4种黏结剂对氧化锆全瓷嵌体边缘微渗漏的影响。方法选取2012年8月佛山市禅城区向阳医院口腔科新鲜拔除的上颌第三磨牙40颗,随机分为A、B、C、D组,每组10颗,制备Ⅴ类洞形。4组离体牙分别采用全酸蚀黏结剂Adper Singlebond 2(A组)及自酸蚀黏结剂ClearFil SE Bond(B组)、Multilink Sprint(C组)和Adper Easy One(D组)黏结氧化锆全瓷嵌体,修复后离体牙经冷热循环后行2%亚甲基蓝染色,根管显微镜下观察各组微渗漏程度并进行比较。结果在牙合壁,C组微渗漏明显高于A和B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);但与D组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在龈壁,C组微渗漏明显高于其他3组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);而其他3组之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论自酸蚀黏结剂ClearFil SE Bond和Adper Easy One的封闭能力较好,且较全酸蚀黏结剂操作简单方便,推荐临床使用。
目的評價4種黏結劑對氧化鋯全瓷嵌體邊緣微滲漏的影響。方法選取2012年8月彿山市禪城區嚮暘醫院口腔科新鮮拔除的上頜第三磨牙40顆,隨機分為A、B、C、D組,每組10顆,製備Ⅴ類洞形。4組離體牙分彆採用全痠蝕黏結劑Adper Singlebond 2(A組)及自痠蝕黏結劑ClearFil SE Bond(B組)、Multilink Sprint(C組)和Adper Easy One(D組)黏結氧化鋯全瓷嵌體,脩複後離體牙經冷熱循環後行2%亞甲基藍染色,根管顯微鏡下觀察各組微滲漏程度併進行比較。結果在牙閤壁,C組微滲漏明顯高于A和B組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);但與D組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。在齦壁,C組微滲漏明顯高于其他3組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);而其他3組之間差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論自痠蝕黏結劑ClearFil SE Bond和Adper Easy One的封閉能力較好,且較全痠蝕黏結劑操作簡單方便,推薦臨床使用。
목적평개4충점결제대양화고전자감체변연미삼루적영향。방법선취2012년8월불산시선성구향양의원구강과신선발제적상합제삼마아40과,수궤분위A、B、C、D조,매조10과,제비Ⅴ류동형。4조리체아분별채용전산식점결제Adper Singlebond 2(A조)급자산식점결제ClearFil SE Bond(B조)、Multilink Sprint(C조)화Adper Easy One(D조)점결양화고전자감체,수복후리체아경랭열순배후행2%아갑기람염색,근관현미경하관찰각조미삼루정도병진행비교。결과재아합벽,C조미삼루명현고우A화B조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);단여D조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。재간벽,C조미삼루명현고우기타3조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);이기타3조지간차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론자산식점결제ClearFil SE Bond화Adper Easy One적봉폐능력교호,차교전산식점결제조작간단방편,추천림상사용。
Objective To evaluate the microleakage and penetration ability of zirconium oxide inlays using different self-etching bonding agents in vitro. Methods Forty caries-free extracted human third molars were randomly divided into four groups with ten teeth each. Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of forty human extracted third molars using diamond burs. The zirconium oxide inlays were placed with Adper Singlebond 2,ClearFil SE Bond,Multil-ink Sprint and Adper Easy One. The microleakage scores were examined on the occlusal and gingival margins at 30 × magnification after each sample was stained. Results Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in both occlusal and gingival margins. Microleakage scores of Multilink Sprint were significantly higher than other groups on both margins. Group of ClearFil SE Bond and Adper Easy One showed no statistical differences with etch-and-rinse resin cement. Conclusion ClearFil SE Bond and Adper Easy One show comparable microleakage re-sults with etch-and-rinse resin cement.