经济问题
經濟問題
경제문제
ECONOMIC PROBLEMS
2013年
8期
109-115
,共7页
农业上市公司%股权结构%股权集中度%股权属性
農業上市公司%股權結構%股權集中度%股權屬性
농업상시공사%고권결구%고권집중도%고권속성
agricultural listed companies%ownership structure%ownership concentration%equity interest
以农业上市公司2008~2012年的数据为实证基础,研究了农业上市公司的整体现状,并从股权集中度和股权属性两个方面研究了农业上市公司的股权结构的财务治理效应,其中股权集中度选择了第一大和前十大股东的持股比例作为解释变量,股权属性则以高管持股比例作为解释变量,通过SPSS的相关性分析和曲线估计及回归分析,进而得出如下结论:一是农业上市公司整体规模较小,对投资者缺乏吸引力;股权集中度较高,没有形成股权相互制衡的机制;高管持股比例较低,股权激励机制没有发挥相应的作用;从整体上看,农业上市公司的股权结构还不完善。二是农业上市公司第一大股东持股比例的治理效应呈现倒U型结构,而前十大股东持股比例则呈现正的治理效应。三是高管持股比例在整体上是正向的治理效应,但在不同的区间则呈现出不同的治理效应。并针对研究结论提出了相应的建议。
以農業上市公司2008~2012年的數據為實證基礎,研究瞭農業上市公司的整體現狀,併從股權集中度和股權屬性兩箇方麵研究瞭農業上市公司的股權結構的財務治理效應,其中股權集中度選擇瞭第一大和前十大股東的持股比例作為解釋變量,股權屬性則以高管持股比例作為解釋變量,通過SPSS的相關性分析和麯線估計及迴歸分析,進而得齣如下結論:一是農業上市公司整體規模較小,對投資者缺乏吸引力;股權集中度較高,沒有形成股權相互製衡的機製;高管持股比例較低,股權激勵機製沒有髮揮相應的作用;從整體上看,農業上市公司的股權結構還不完善。二是農業上市公司第一大股東持股比例的治理效應呈現倒U型結構,而前十大股東持股比例則呈現正的治理效應。三是高管持股比例在整體上是正嚮的治理效應,但在不同的區間則呈現齣不同的治理效應。併針對研究結論提齣瞭相應的建議。
이농업상시공사2008~2012년적수거위실증기출,연구료농업상시공사적정체현상,병종고권집중도화고권속성량개방면연구료농업상시공사적고권결구적재무치리효응,기중고권집중도선택료제일대화전십대고동적지고비례작위해석변량,고권속성칙이고관지고비례작위해석변량,통과SPSS적상관성분석화곡선고계급회귀분석,진이득출여하결론:일시농업상시공사정체규모교소,대투자자결핍흡인력;고권집중도교고,몰유형성고권상호제형적궤제;고관지고비례교저,고권격려궤제몰유발휘상응적작용;종정체상간,농업상시공사적고권결구환불완선。이시농업상시공사제일대고동지고비례적치리효응정현도U형결구,이전십대고동지고비례칙정현정적치리효응。삼시고관지고비례재정체상시정향적치리효응,단재불동적구간칙정현출불동적치리효응。병침대연구결론제출료상응적건의。
Based on evidence agricultural listed companies 2008~2012 data,this paper studied the overall situ-ation, and from two aspects of ownership concentration and equity properties studied the agricultural listed company's equity structure governance effect , including ownership concentration chose the first big and top ten shareholders of shareholding proportion as explained variable , with executives shareholding equity attributes as explanatory varia-bles , through the SPSS correlation analysis , then draws the following conclusions.One is the agricultural listed com-panies as a whole on a smaller scale , less attractive to investors , and equity concentration is higher , the executives shareholding proportion is low , equity incentive mechanism did not play the corresponding role.Agricultural listed company equity structure is not perfect.Second , agricultural listed companies governance effect of the proportion of the first largest shareholder presents inverted u -shaped structure , while the top 10 shareholders holding a positive governance effect.Three is executives shareholding is positive governance effect on the whole , but in different inter-vals of different governance effect.In view of the research conclusion in this paper , then the writer put forward the corresponding Suggestions.