南方医科大学学报
南方醫科大學學報
남방의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2013年
10期
1467-1470
,共4页
邓劲松%周路遥%曾斯慧%张春丽%曾广绥%王洁%陈庆康
鄧勁鬆%週路遙%曾斯慧%張春麗%曾廣綏%王潔%陳慶康
산경송%주로요%증사혜%장춘려%증엄수%왕길%진경강
膀胱输尿管返流%超声检查%微气泡%逆行膀胱输尿管造影术
膀胱輸尿管返流%超聲檢查%微氣泡%逆行膀胱輸尿管造影術
방광수뇨관반류%초성검사%미기포%역행방광수뇨관조영술
vesicoureteral reflux%ultrasonography microbubbles%fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography
目的探讨Sonovue排泄性尿路超声造影(VUS)评估膀胱输尿管返流(VUR)的价值。方法纳入36例[共72个肾盂-输尿管单位(Pyelo-Ureter Units, PUUs)]临床疑为膀胱输尿管返流且同时进行了VUS和排泄性X线膀胱尿路造影(VCUG)的儿童病人。比较VUS和VCUG发现VUR的敏感性和一致性。根据返流分级标准比较两者判断返流分级的一致性。结果72个PPUs,VUS发现26个PUUs(36.1%,26/72),而VCUG发现21个PUUs(29.2%)存在返流,两者对返流检出率的差异无统计学意义(P=0.347)。65个PUUs(90.3%,65/72)的结果在两种方法完全一样(McNemar检验,Kappa值=0.843),表明两者的一致性较好。另外,VUS经会阴部观察还显示了2个病例的后尿道瓣膜。结论 Sonovue介导的VUS在检测和分级膀胱输尿管反流上不差于甚至优于VCUG,且更安全,应该作为膀胱输尿管返流的首选筛查和随访工具。另外,VUS经会阴部观察对评估后尿道病变也有一定帮助。
目的探討Sonovue排洩性尿路超聲造影(VUS)評估膀胱輸尿管返流(VUR)的價值。方法納入36例[共72箇腎盂-輸尿管單位(Pyelo-Ureter Units, PUUs)]臨床疑為膀胱輸尿管返流且同時進行瞭VUS和排洩性X線膀胱尿路造影(VCUG)的兒童病人。比較VUS和VCUG髮現VUR的敏感性和一緻性。根據返流分級標準比較兩者判斷返流分級的一緻性。結果72箇PPUs,VUS髮現26箇PUUs(36.1%,26/72),而VCUG髮現21箇PUUs(29.2%)存在返流,兩者對返流檢齣率的差異無統計學意義(P=0.347)。65箇PUUs(90.3%,65/72)的結果在兩種方法完全一樣(McNemar檢驗,Kappa值=0.843),錶明兩者的一緻性較好。另外,VUS經會陰部觀察還顯示瞭2箇病例的後尿道瓣膜。結論 Sonovue介導的VUS在檢測和分級膀胱輸尿管反流上不差于甚至優于VCUG,且更安全,應該作為膀胱輸尿管返流的首選篩查和隨訪工具。另外,VUS經會陰部觀察對評估後尿道病變也有一定幫助。
목적탐토Sonovue배설성뇨로초성조영(VUS)평고방광수뇨관반류(VUR)적개치。방법납입36례[공72개신우-수뇨관단위(Pyelo-Ureter Units, PUUs)]림상의위방광수뇨관반류차동시진행료VUS화배설성X선방광뇨로조영(VCUG)적인동병인。비교VUS화VCUG발현VUR적민감성화일치성。근거반류분급표준비교량자판단반류분급적일치성。결과72개PPUs,VUS발현26개PUUs(36.1%,26/72),이VCUG발현21개PUUs(29.2%)존재반류,량자대반류검출솔적차이무통계학의의(P=0.347)。65개PUUs(90.3%,65/72)적결과재량충방법완전일양(McNemar검험,Kappa치=0.843),표명량자적일치성교호。령외,VUS경회음부관찰환현시료2개병례적후뇨도판막。결론 Sonovue개도적VUS재검측화분급방광수뇨관반류상불차우심지우우VCUG,차경안전,응해작위방광수뇨관반류적수선사사화수방공구。령외,VUS경회음부관찰대평고후뇨도병변야유일정방조。
Objective To assess the value of voiding urosonography (VUS) with SonoVue in evaluation of vesicoureteral reflux. Methods Thirty-six pediatric patients (72 pyeloureter units [PUUs]) suspected of vesicoureteral reflux underwent both VUS and fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). The sensitivity of VUS and VCUG and their consistency in detecting vesicoureteral reflux as well as in grading vesicoureteral reflux were compared. Results Vesicoureteral reflux was detected in 26 of the 72 PUUs (36.1%) by VUS while in 21 PUUs (29.2%) by VCUG (P=0.347). The two modalities yielded the same results for 65 PUUs (κ=0.843), showing a very good consistency between them. VUS also detected post-urethral valve in 2 patients via transperineal scans. Conclusion VUS with Sonovue has at least comparable, if not better, sensitivity in detecting vesicoureteral reflux with VCUG, and therefore should serve as the primary screening and follow-up modality for vesicoureteral reflux. In addition, transperineal VUS can be helpful in evaluation of post-urethral lesions.