国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2012年
24期
3663-3666
,共4页
优质护理服务%消化内科%焦虑%抑郁
優質護理服務%消化內科%焦慮%抑鬱
우질호리복무%소화내과%초필%억욱
High quality nursing service%GI medicine%Anxiety%Depression
目的 探讨优质护理服务对消化内科住院患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响.方法 选择2011年5月至2012年2月在我院消化内科住院治疗的136例消化内科住院患者作为研究对象,运用随机数字表法将入组患者分为常规护理组和护理干预组,常规护理组仅给予一般常规护理,护理干预组则在常规护理组基础上给予优质护理服务,比较常规护理组和护理干预组患者焦虑抑郁情绪的差异.结果 经过2周的观察,常规护理组和护理干预组焦虑标准分分别为(51.01±5.96)和(47.93±6.03),常规护理组和护理干预组患者焦虑情绪标准分差异有统计学意义(t=4.249,P＜0.05);护理干预组和常规护理组抑郁标准分分别为(52.40±4.70)和(50.01±5.84),2组患者抑郁情绪标准分差异有统计学意义(t=3.719,P＜0.05).结论 通过对消化内科住院患者开展优质护理活动明显改善了患者的焦虑及抑郁情绪,有利于改善患者的预后.
目的 探討優質護理服務對消化內科住院患者焦慮抑鬱情緒的影響.方法 選擇2011年5月至2012年2月在我院消化內科住院治療的136例消化內科住院患者作為研究對象,運用隨機數字錶法將入組患者分為常規護理組和護理榦預組,常規護理組僅給予一般常規護理,護理榦預組則在常規護理組基礎上給予優質護理服務,比較常規護理組和護理榦預組患者焦慮抑鬱情緒的差異.結果 經過2週的觀察,常規護理組和護理榦預組焦慮標準分分彆為(51.01±5.96)和(47.93±6.03),常規護理組和護理榦預組患者焦慮情緒標準分差異有統計學意義(t=4.249,P＜0.05);護理榦預組和常規護理組抑鬱標準分分彆為(52.40±4.70)和(50.01±5.84),2組患者抑鬱情緒標準分差異有統計學意義(t=3.719,P＜0.05).結論 通過對消化內科住院患者開展優質護理活動明顯改善瞭患者的焦慮及抑鬱情緒,有利于改善患者的預後.
목적 탐토우질호리복무대소화내과주원환자초필억욱정서적영향.방법 선택2011년5월지2012년2월재아원소화내과주원치료적136례소화내과주원환자작위연구대상,운용수궤수자표법장입조환자분위상규호리조화호리간예조,상규호리조부급여일반상규호리,호리간예조칙재상규호리조기출상급여우질호리복무,비교상규호리조화호리간예조환자초필억욱정서적차이.결과 경과2주적관찰,상규호리조화호리간예조초필표준분분별위(51.01±5.96)화(47.93±6.03),상규호리조화호리간예조환자초필정서표준분차이유통계학의의(t=4.249,P＜0.05);호리간예조화상규호리조억욱표준분분별위(52.40±4.70)화(50.01±5.84),2조환자억욱정서표준분차이유통계학의의(t=3.719,P＜0.05).결론 통과대소화내과주원환자개전우질호리활동명현개선료환자적초필급억욱정서,유리우개선환자적예후.
Objective To study the effects of high quality nursing service on improving anxiety and depression emotions of patients in digestion department of internal medicine.Methods From May 2011 to February 2012 in our digestion department of internal medicine,136 patients with were divided into the routine nursing group and nursing intervention group,the routine nursing group only received routine nursing,the nursing intervention group patients in the usual care group was given based on high quality of nursing service,Comparison of conventional nursing care and intervention group differences in depression and anxiety of patients with.Resul After 2weeks of observation,Routine nursing care and intervention group standard score of anxiety were (51.01 ± 5.96) and (47.93 ± 6.03),Routine nursing care and intervention group in patients with anxiety standard difference was statistically significant (t =4.249,P＜0.05); The nursing intervention group and routine nursing group depression criteria were (52.40 ± 4.70)and (50.01 ± 5.84),In 2 groups of patients with depressive mood standard difference was statistically significant (t=3.719,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Based on the digestion of inpatients in Department of internal medicine for quality care activities significantly improved in patients with anxiety and depression,To improve the prognosis of the patients.
