农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2013年
20期
234-244
,共11页
花晓波%阎建忠%王琦%张叶生
花曉波%閻建忠%王琦%張葉生
화효파%염건충%왕기%장협생
土地利用%农村地区%农业%经济%耕地利用集约度%影响因素%大渡河上游
土地利用%農村地區%農業%經濟%耕地利用集約度%影響因素%大渡河上遊
토지이용%농촌지구%농업%경제%경지이용집약도%영향인소%대도하상유
land use%rural areas%agriculture%economics%cultivated land use intensity%influencing factors%the upper Dadu River watershed
集约度变化是土地利用变化研究的核心问题,而目前对西部地区耕地利用集约度特征及原因解释的研究较少。该文采取参与式农村评估法(participatory rural appraisal,PRA),以大渡河上游典型河谷与半山区为例,共调查农户357户,通过Tobit和OLS估计方法,定量对比分析了河谷与半山区耕地利用集约度及其影响因素。研究表明:河谷区和半山区在耕地利用集约度上存在显著差异。无论是资本集约度还是劳动集约度,河谷区均高于半山区。影响河谷与半山区耕地利用集约度差异的因素有承包耕地面积、人均实际耕地面积、家庭固定资产、离集镇的距离、二三产业收入、农业劳动力、年需换工数量、人情往来支出等。耕地资源禀赋和农业劳动力数量是导致集约度差异的关键因素,农业生产条件或环境和家庭收入水平对其有重要影响。
集約度變化是土地利用變化研究的覈心問題,而目前對西部地區耕地利用集約度特徵及原因解釋的研究較少。該文採取參與式農村評估法(participatory rural appraisal,PRA),以大渡河上遊典型河穀與半山區為例,共調查農戶357戶,通過Tobit和OLS估計方法,定量對比分析瞭河穀與半山區耕地利用集約度及其影響因素。研究錶明:河穀區和半山區在耕地利用集約度上存在顯著差異。無論是資本集約度還是勞動集約度,河穀區均高于半山區。影響河穀與半山區耕地利用集約度差異的因素有承包耕地麵積、人均實際耕地麵積、傢庭固定資產、離集鎮的距離、二三產業收入、農業勞動力、年需換工數量、人情往來支齣等。耕地資源稟賦和農業勞動力數量是導緻集約度差異的關鍵因素,農業生產條件或環境和傢庭收入水平對其有重要影響。
집약도변화시토지이용변화연구적핵심문제,이목전대서부지구경지이용집약도특정급원인해석적연구교소。해문채취삼여식농촌평고법(participatory rural appraisal,PRA),이대도하상유전형하곡여반산구위례,공조사농호357호,통과Tobit화OLS고계방법,정량대비분석료하곡여반산구경지이용집약도급기영향인소。연구표명:하곡구화반산구재경지이용집약도상존재현저차이。무론시자본집약도환시노동집약도,하곡구균고우반산구。영향하곡여반산구경지이용집약도차이적인소유승포경지면적、인균실제경지면적、가정고정자산、리집진적거리、이삼산업수입、농업노동력、년수환공수량、인정왕래지출등。경지자원품부화농업노동력수량시도치집약도차이적관건인소,농업생산조건혹배경화가정수입수평대기유중요영향。
Changes in land use intensity are core academic issues in land-use change research. At present, empirical studies on features and driving forces on cultivated land use intensity in Western China are scarce. Besides, how to apply quantitative analysis methods to analyze the influencing factors on the cultivated land use intensity in depth also lack in the research. This paper analyzes differences of cultivated land use intensity based on the field surveys of 357 households in five villages from valley to the middle mountain area of Jinchuan County in the upper Dadu River watershed, by adopting the methods of participatory rural appraisal (PRA). This paper also qualitatively and quantitatively analyzes the factors influencing on the differences using Tobit model and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimation method. The results show that:1) There are statistically significant differences in cultivated land use intensity between the valley and the middle mountain area. Both capital intensity and labor intensity in valley are higher than that in middle mountain area. In capital intensity of land use, the inputs of seeds, fertilizer, pesticide, herbicide and other production in valley area are more than that in semi-mountain area. However, it shows the converse situation in mulch inputs. Labor intensity varies by different cropping system. From these three most important food crops cultivation in corn, wheat and potatoes, planting“Corn+Wheat”two crops in a year are common in valley area, while in semi-mountain area, there has a gradual transition from originally planting two crops a year of corn and wheat to one crop of corn merely. 2) By quantitative analysis of Tobit and OLS regression model, we obtain that influencing factors on differences of cultivated land use intensity including originally contracted arable land, real per capita arable area, the family of fixed assets, the distance away from the market, income from the secondary and tertiary industries, the total family labor force, agricultural labor force, the number of years au pair and social relations. In valley area, originally contracted arable land and income from the secondary and tertiary industries have the negative impact on cultivated land use intensity, while real per capita arable area, the family of fixed assets, the total family labor force, agricultural labor force and the number of year au pair have positive influence. In semi-mountain area, originally contracted arable land and the total family labor force have the positive impact on cultivated land use intensity. However, the family of fixed assets, the distance away from the market and social relations have the negative impact. 3) Cultivated land resource endowment and number of agricultural labor force are key factors to cause cultivated land use intensity differences. In addition, the conditions or environment for agricultural production and family income levels also have important impacts on cultivated land use intensity differences. Using the results as bases, this study proposes that the government should promote the land transfer orderly, support the agricultural labor force, such as increasing agricultural subsidies on labor-saving input, improving labors’ education and health levels, and further improving the rural infrastructure to facilitate the local farmers, etc.