农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2013年
20期
226-233
,共8页
管栩%金晓斌%潘倩%周寅康
管栩%金曉斌%潘倩%週寅康
관허%금효빈%반천%주인강
土地利用%整治%农村地区%新增耕地%来源结构%空间差异%县域
土地利用%整治%農村地區%新增耕地%來源結構%空間差異%縣域
토지이용%정치%농촌지구%신증경지%래원결구%공간차이%현역
land use%consolidation%rural areas%newly increased cultivated land%source structure%spatial difference%county
为探索中国土地整治新增耕地在数量及来源上的空间分布特征,利用2006-2012年土地整治项目信息,基于县域尺度,采用空间自相关方法,对近年来中国土地整治新增耕地数量及来源结构的空间差异进行分析,结合自然资源条件、经济发展水平、土地利用政策等分析了差异产生的原因,得到以下研究结论:在空间分布上,土地整治新增耕地总体呈现东部高于西部、经济发达区高于欠发达区、粮食主产区高于非粮食主产区、平原地区高于山地丘陵区;在空间关联性上,县域尺度下新增耕地在空间分布上存在较为显著的空间正相关性,东部沿海经济发达区、土地开发重点区为新增耕地高-高集聚区,中、西部欠发达、自然资源条件较差及后备资源有限的地区为新增耕地低-低集聚区;在新增耕地来源结构上,具有显著的区域及省际间差异。东部发达地区主要以整理和复垦来源为主,北方地区的新增耕地多由土地开发和整理获得,中部地区来源复杂,四川、重庆以整理来源居多,陕西中部、湖北大部多为整理、复垦类型;南方广东、广西、贵州、湖南、江西多为开发类型。经济水平及资源条件相似的广东与浙江、辽宁与吉林等省份之间具有明显的省际差异。该研究结果为相关宏观决策提供数据参考。
為探索中國土地整治新增耕地在數量及來源上的空間分佈特徵,利用2006-2012年土地整治項目信息,基于縣域呎度,採用空間自相關方法,對近年來中國土地整治新增耕地數量及來源結構的空間差異進行分析,結閤自然資源條件、經濟髮展水平、土地利用政策等分析瞭差異產生的原因,得到以下研究結論:在空間分佈上,土地整治新增耕地總體呈現東部高于西部、經濟髮達區高于欠髮達區、糧食主產區高于非糧食主產區、平原地區高于山地丘陵區;在空間關聯性上,縣域呎度下新增耕地在空間分佈上存在較為顯著的空間正相關性,東部沿海經濟髮達區、土地開髮重點區為新增耕地高-高集聚區,中、西部欠髮達、自然資源條件較差及後備資源有限的地區為新增耕地低-低集聚區;在新增耕地來源結構上,具有顯著的區域及省際間差異。東部髮達地區主要以整理和複墾來源為主,北方地區的新增耕地多由土地開髮和整理穫得,中部地區來源複雜,四川、重慶以整理來源居多,陝西中部、湖北大部多為整理、複墾類型;南方廣東、廣西、貴州、湖南、江西多為開髮類型。經濟水平及資源條件相似的廣東與浙江、遼寧與吉林等省份之間具有明顯的省際差異。該研究結果為相關宏觀決策提供數據參攷。
위탐색중국토지정치신증경지재수량급래원상적공간분포특정,이용2006-2012년토지정치항목신식,기우현역척도,채용공간자상관방법,대근년래중국토지정치신증경지수량급래원결구적공간차이진행분석,결합자연자원조건、경제발전수평、토지이용정책등분석료차이산생적원인,득도이하연구결론:재공간분포상,토지정치신증경지총체정현동부고우서부、경제발체구고우흠발체구、양식주산구고우비양식주산구、평원지구고우산지구릉구;재공간관련성상,현역척도하신증경지재공간분포상존재교위현저적공간정상관성,동부연해경제발체구、토지개발중점구위신증경지고-고집취구,중、서부흠발체、자연자원조건교차급후비자원유한적지구위신증경지저-저집취구;재신증경지래원결구상,구유현저적구역급성제간차이。동부발체지구주요이정리화복은래원위주,북방지구적신증경지다유토지개발화정리획득,중부지구래원복잡,사천、중경이정리래원거다,협서중부、호북대부다위정리、복은류형;남방엄동、엄서、귀주、호남、강서다위개발류형。경제수평급자원조건상사적엄동여절강、료녕여길림등성빈지간구유명현적성제차이。해연구결과위상관굉관결책제공수거삼고。
In order to find out the spatial difference regarding quantity and source structure of newly increased cultivated land by consolidation in China, the data are acquired from a consolidation project from 2006 to 2012 by the Ministry of Land and Resources. This paper first analyzes the spatial-temporal pattern of China’s newly increased cultivated land at county level according to corresponding data, and Geoda software is used to analyze the spatial correlation of newly increased cultivated land area and produces a LISA cluster map. Then the source structure of newly increased cultivated land is divided into seven categories, which forms a spatial-temporal pattern map. Finally we analyze the spatial difference of quantity and source structure of these land based on the above three maps, aiming to figure out the reason for these differences through analyzing natural conditions, economic development level, land use policy and other factors. The results showed that: 1) In terms of spatial distribution, newly increased cultivated land in eastern China ranks higher than that of the western, developed areas higher than less developed places, grain producing areas higher than the counterparts, and plains higher than mountainous and hilly areas. It can be easily found that the amount of newly increased cultivated land is closely related to regional economy and the reserve of cultivated land. 2) Newly increased cultivated land at county level has a clear positive correlation with spatial allocation, namely, developed regions near the eastern coast and key areas of land development are high-high areas, whereas less developed areas in central and western China, where was poor concerning natural condition and regional resources reserve are low-low areas. At the same time, high-low areas and low-high areas form great contrasts with surrounding areas in economy and resource. 3) When it comes to the source structure of newly increased cultivated land, there are significant regional and provincial differences. Newly increased cultivated land in the eastern coastal developed regions comes mainly from land consolidation and reclamation while in northern regions development and consolidation contribute the most. Source structure in central China was complex. To be more specific, most of the cultivated land in Sichuan and Chongqing are from land consolidation, while in middle Shanxi and Hubei land consolidation and reclamation create more cultivated land. Land development rate is high in Guangdong, Guangxi, Hunan, etc. Even between those provinces that are similar in economy and resource, such as Guangdong and Zhejiang, Liaoning and Jilin, significant differences still exist. The above results reflect that the source structure of newly increased cultivated land in eastern coastal provinces is reasonable, and its current arrangement of land consolidation is suitable to optimize the structure of land use and sustainable development. Meanwhile, the source structure of newly increased cultivated land of some provinces is unsatisfied and needs to be guided and changed. In the future, the guiding role of national land consolidation planning should be strengthened to standardize the provincial land consolidation project. Taking the opportunity of the construction of well-facilitated primary farmland, it is necessary to give priority to land consolidation, attach importance to land reclamation and control land development.