农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2013年
20期
1-10
,共10页
粮食%模型%农业%经济%空间面板计量经济模型%产量%影响因素%中国
糧食%模型%農業%經濟%空間麵闆計量經濟模型%產量%影響因素%中國
양식%모형%농업%경제%공간면판계량경제모형%산량%영향인소%중국
grain%models%agriculture%economics%spatial econometric models for panel data%yield%influence factors%China
基于1990-2011年分省面板数据,应用均值、标准差与区位基尼系数揭示了中国粮食产量的阶段特征与主导类型,进而利用空间面板计量经济模型探讨了中国粮食产量变化的影响因素。结果表明:中国粮食产量变化可分为3个阶段,主要年份各粮食主导类型包含的省份存在较大差异;土地投入的影响由强转弱,劳动力依次表现为正显著、不显著与负显著,不同类型的资本投入存在迥异的影响效应;粮食产量同时受到农业结构调整、非农产业发展等宏观背景以及空间随机误差溢出效应的影响;不同主导类型的粮食产量变化机制存在差异,体现要素边际报酬递减、规模效应、政府调控等内在规律与外在因素的综合作用。该文揭示了全国及各主导类型的粮食产量波动原因及其作用规律,有助于确定各区域粮食增产的主要制约因素与提升途径,该研究为中央制定差别化的粮食生产支持政策提供参考。
基于1990-2011年分省麵闆數據,應用均值、標準差與區位基尼繫數揭示瞭中國糧食產量的階段特徵與主導類型,進而利用空間麵闆計量經濟模型探討瞭中國糧食產量變化的影響因素。結果錶明:中國糧食產量變化可分為3箇階段,主要年份各糧食主導類型包含的省份存在較大差異;土地投入的影響由彊轉弱,勞動力依次錶現為正顯著、不顯著與負顯著,不同類型的資本投入存在迥異的影響效應;糧食產量同時受到農業結構調整、非農產業髮展等宏觀揹景以及空間隨機誤差溢齣效應的影響;不同主導類型的糧食產量變化機製存在差異,體現要素邊際報酬遞減、規模效應、政府調控等內在規律與外在因素的綜閤作用。該文揭示瞭全國及各主導類型的糧食產量波動原因及其作用規律,有助于確定各區域糧食增產的主要製約因素與提升途徑,該研究為中央製定差彆化的糧食生產支持政策提供參攷。
기우1990-2011년분성면판수거,응용균치、표준차여구위기니계수게시료중국양식산량적계단특정여주도류형,진이이용공간면판계량경제모형탐토료중국양식산량변화적영향인소。결과표명:중국양식산량변화가분위3개계단,주요년빈각양식주도류형포함적성빈존재교대차이;토지투입적영향유강전약,노동력의차표현위정현저、불현저여부현저,불동류형적자본투입존재형이적영향효응;양식산량동시수도농업결구조정、비농산업발전등굉관배경이급공간수궤오차일출효응적영향;불동주도류형적양식산량변화궤제존재차이,체현요소변제보수체감、규모효응、정부조공등내재규률여외재인소적종합작용。해문게시료전국급각주도류형적양식산량파동원인급기작용규률,유조우학정각구역양식증산적주요제약인소여제승도경,해연구위중앙제정차별화적양식생산지지정책제공삼고。
Despite high attention to the stability and increase of grain production and market supply by Chinese government, grain yield in China has been undergoing a great fluctuation during the past decades, which could be a big challenge to national food security. This paper thus analyzes the spatial-temporal characteristics and influence factors of grain yield change in China since 1990 from the aspect of evolution stages and main types. Statistical indicators and spatial econometric models for panel data are introduced, which are supported by Geodata, ArcGIS, and Matlab software. It shows that the growing process of Chinese grain yield has three stages, namely stage 1990-1998, 1998-2003, and 2003-2011 respectively. Meanwhile, provinces in China can be categorized into three sets according to different supply-demand relationships, which are provinces with surplus grain (PGSG), provinces with balanced grain supply and demand (PBGSD), and provinces with insufficient grain supply (PIGS). The three separate types vary every year, with different provinces included each other. Roughly speaking, the grain production status of eastern provinces, central provinces, western provinces, and northeastern provinces is decreased, weakened, enhanced and strengthened respectively. In 2011, the PGSG, the PBGSD, and the PIGS distribute mainly at North, Middle, and South China respectively. Among all the factors that influence grain yield, the land factor has a significant positive impact, changing from strong to weak. It indicates grain production in China is increasingly dependent upon factors that contribute to per unit yield, such as technical progress, capital investment, etc. The labor factor brings an effect from positive significant to insignificant then negative significant, reflecting the change of agricultural surplus labor, rural labor structure, etc. The impact of different types of capital input varies as follows. Definitely, agricultural infrastructure investment, represented by irrigation facilities, has a strong positive effect. As a kind of labor saving capital investment, the total power of agricultural machinery brings about‘positive to negative and positive again’ effect;the chemical fertilizer input, as a representative of agricultural materials, follows the law of diminishing returns to scale. Besides agricultural production factors, agricultural structure adjustment, non-agricultural industry development, and random error factors of neighboring provinces also influence the actual yield. As to the three separate types, the driving mechanism of grain yield change differs significantly, including the impact of agricultural production factors and that of macro environment. It is the mutual result of both internal law such as diminishing marginal returns and scale effect and external factors such as government regulation. Taking into account the above different driving mechanism, it will be meaningful to promote the regional division of grain production among the PGSG, the PBGSD, and the PIGS, to protect a large-scale arable land resource with a special priority to the project of arable land consolidation and protection in PGSG, to change the focal point of financial support and land consolidation to improve the efficiency of agricultural infrastructure, to solve the scarcity of agricultural labor by measures such as the cognizance of agricultural producers, and to promote agricultural mechanization with an emphasis to plain agricultural area, and which in all will help stabilize and increase grain yield in China.