中国农学通报
中國農學通報
중국농학통보
CHINESE AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE BULLETIN
2013年
24期
90-94
,共5页
杜兴彬%陈晨%王良军%刘国兰%顾晓君%余新桥
杜興彬%陳晨%王良軍%劉國蘭%顧曉君%餘新橋
두흥빈%진신%왕량군%류국란%고효군%여신교
节水抗旱稻%土壤调理剂%“艾佐迈”%‘旱优8号’%氮肥
節水抗旱稻%土壤調理劑%“艾佐邁”%‘旱優8號’%氮肥
절수항한도%토양조리제%“애좌매”%‘한우8호’%담비
water-saving and drought-resistance rice%soil conditioner%Azomite%‘Hanyou 8’%N fertilizer
为了研究土壤调理剂“艾作迈”(Azomite)对节水抗旱稻(WDR)生长发育和产量的影响,在节水栽培模式下,以杂交节水抗旱稻品种‘旱优8号’为试验材料,按照施氮量设160 kg/hm2(LN)、200 kg/hm2(NN)和240 kg/hm2(HN)3种肥力水平,以不施“艾佐迈”土壤调理剂为对照进行田间试验。结果表明:在3种氮肥水平下,施用“艾佐迈”都使‘旱优8号’植株剑叶叶绿素含量、株高、单株有效穗、穗长、单株产量增加,在LN和NN水平下实际产量显著增加6.41%和11.1%。在土壤营养方面,施用“艾佐迈”对土壤pH没有影响;3种氮肥水平下土壤全氮含量、速效钾含量比对照降低,在LN和NN水平下,施用“艾佐迈”使土壤有机质含量和速效磷含量增加,在NN和HN水平下,施用“艾佐迈”的处理土壤速效氮含量比对照增加。
為瞭研究土壤調理劑“艾作邁”(Azomite)對節水抗旱稻(WDR)生長髮育和產量的影響,在節水栽培模式下,以雜交節水抗旱稻品種‘旱優8號’為試驗材料,按照施氮量設160 kg/hm2(LN)、200 kg/hm2(NN)和240 kg/hm2(HN)3種肥力水平,以不施“艾佐邁”土壤調理劑為對照進行田間試驗。結果錶明:在3種氮肥水平下,施用“艾佐邁”都使‘旱優8號’植株劍葉葉綠素含量、株高、單株有效穗、穗長、單株產量增加,在LN和NN水平下實際產量顯著增加6.41%和11.1%。在土壤營養方麵,施用“艾佐邁”對土壤pH沒有影響;3種氮肥水平下土壤全氮含量、速效鉀含量比對照降低,在LN和NN水平下,施用“艾佐邁”使土壤有機質含量和速效燐含量增加,在NN和HN水平下,施用“艾佐邁”的處理土壤速效氮含量比對照增加。
위료연구토양조리제“애작매”(Azomite)대절수항한도(WDR)생장발육화산량적영향,재절수재배모식하,이잡교절수항한도품충‘한우8호’위시험재료,안조시담량설160 kg/hm2(LN)、200 kg/hm2(NN)화240 kg/hm2(HN)3충비력수평,이불시“애좌매”토양조리제위대조진행전간시험。결과표명:재3충담비수평하,시용“애좌매”도사‘한우8호’식주검협협록소함량、주고、단주유효수、수장、단주산량증가,재LN화NN수평하실제산량현저증가6.41%화11.1%。재토양영양방면,시용“애좌매”대토양pH몰유영향;3충담비수평하토양전담함량、속효갑함량비대조강저,재LN화NN수평하,시용“애좌매”사토양유궤질함량화속효린함량증가,재NN화HN수평하,시용“애좌매”적처리토양속효담함량비대조증가。
In order to study the effect of Azomite on growth and yield of‘Hanyou8’, a water-saving and drought-resistant rice, was used as the sample, the experiment was carried under three N rates including 160 kg/hm2 (LN), 200 kg/hm2 (NN) and 240 kg/hm2 (HN). No Azomite fertilizer as a control, the experiment was carried under water-saving cultivation mode. The results show that: in the three N rates, Azomite could increase plants flag leaf chlorophyll content, plant height, panicle number, spike length, grain yield of‘Hanyou8’, in LN and NN, the actual yield was increased 6.41% and 11.1% respectively in significantly. In the soil, Azomite has no effect on soil pH. The total N and available P reduced in three N rates. Soil organic matter, available P was increased in LN and NN treatments; available N was increased in NN and HN treatments.