中华地方病学杂志
中華地方病學雜誌
중화지방병학잡지
Chinese Journal of Endemiology
2014年
4期
404-406
,共3页
鲁青%何多龙%杨萍%李生梅%姜泓%陈萍%蒲光兰%吴海坤%喇翠玲%魏生英
魯青%何多龍%楊萍%李生梅%薑泓%陳萍%蒲光蘭%吳海坤%喇翠玲%魏生英
로청%하다룡%양평%리생매%강홍%진평%포광란%오해곤%나취령%위생영
氟中毒%茶%民族
氟中毒%茶%民族
불중독%다%민족
Fluorosis%Tea%Ethnic
目的:了解饮茶型氟中毒在青海省6个民族人群中的分布,为地方性饮茶型氟中毒防治提供依据。方法2010年,按照《全国饮茶型地方性氟中毒流行现状调查方案》要求,在青海省有饮砖茶习惯的28个县,选择占全省总人口数99.59%的6个民族进行氟中毒调查。每个县抽查3个乡和1个镇(牧区、农业区、半农半牧区、城镇),每个乡(城镇)抽取2个行政村(居委会),每个行政村(居委会)抽查50名成人调查日饮茶水量及日摄氟量。对成人进行氟斑牙、氟骨症及尿氟检查。每个村(居委会)采集茶水样5~6份,用于茶氟测定。氟斑牙诊断采用Deans法,茶氟、尿氟检测采用氟离子选择电极法,成人临床氟骨症诊断参照《地方性氟骨症诊断标准》(WS 192-2008)。结果共调查10335人,其中藏族4972人,汉族3063人,回族1196人,蒙古族634人,土族235人,撒拉族235人;人均日饮茶水量蒙古族为2.53 L,藏族为2.19 L,回族为1.74 L,土族为1.63 L,汉族为1.22 L,撒拉族为1.07 L;日人均摄氟量藏族为3.99 mg,蒙古族为2.78 mg、土族为2.27 mg,回族为2.16 mg,汉族为1.78 mg,撒拉族为1.28 mg;尿氟中位数藏族为1.46 mg/L,土族为1.19 mg/L,回族为1.12 mg/L,汉族为0.98 mg/L,蒙古族为0.93 mg/L,撒拉族为0.81 mg/L。氟斑牙检出率回族为34.53%(413/1196),汉族为27.07%(829/3063),藏族为21.60%(1074/4972),土族为20.00%(47/235),蒙古族为17.98%(114/634),撒拉族为6.38%(15/235)。氟骨症检出率藏族为13.42%(667/4972)、蒙古族为11.04%(70/634)、汉族为9.31%(285/3063),回族为7.61%(91/1196),土族为5.53%(13/235),撒拉族为4.26%(10/235)。结论饮茶型氟中毒在青海省6个民族人群中分布不同,病情流行情况轻重不同,藏族和蒙古族是青海省今后地方性饮茶型氟中毒防治的重点人群。
目的:瞭解飲茶型氟中毒在青海省6箇民族人群中的分佈,為地方性飲茶型氟中毒防治提供依據。方法2010年,按照《全國飲茶型地方性氟中毒流行現狀調查方案》要求,在青海省有飲磚茶習慣的28箇縣,選擇佔全省總人口數99.59%的6箇民族進行氟中毒調查。每箇縣抽查3箇鄉和1箇鎮(牧區、農業區、半農半牧區、城鎮),每箇鄉(城鎮)抽取2箇行政村(居委會),每箇行政村(居委會)抽查50名成人調查日飲茶水量及日攝氟量。對成人進行氟斑牙、氟骨癥及尿氟檢查。每箇村(居委會)採集茶水樣5~6份,用于茶氟測定。氟斑牙診斷採用Deans法,茶氟、尿氟檢測採用氟離子選擇電極法,成人臨床氟骨癥診斷參照《地方性氟骨癥診斷標準》(WS 192-2008)。結果共調查10335人,其中藏族4972人,漢族3063人,迴族1196人,矇古族634人,土族235人,撒拉族235人;人均日飲茶水量矇古族為2.53 L,藏族為2.19 L,迴族為1.74 L,土族為1.63 L,漢族為1.22 L,撒拉族為1.07 L;日人均攝氟量藏族為3.99 mg,矇古族為2.78 mg、土族為2.27 mg,迴族為2.16 mg,漢族為1.78 mg,撒拉族為1.28 mg;尿氟中位數藏族為1.46 mg/L,土族為1.19 mg/L,迴族為1.12 mg/L,漢族為0.98 mg/L,矇古族為0.93 mg/L,撒拉族為0.81 mg/L。氟斑牙檢齣率迴族為34.53%(413/1196),漢族為27.07%(829/3063),藏族為21.60%(1074/4972),土族為20.00%(47/235),矇古族為17.98%(114/634),撒拉族為6.38%(15/235)。氟骨癥檢齣率藏族為13.42%(667/4972)、矇古族為11.04%(70/634)、漢族為9.31%(285/3063),迴族為7.61%(91/1196),土族為5.53%(13/235),撒拉族為4.26%(10/235)。結論飲茶型氟中毒在青海省6箇民族人群中分佈不同,病情流行情況輕重不同,藏族和矇古族是青海省今後地方性飲茶型氟中毒防治的重點人群。
목적:료해음다형불중독재청해성6개민족인군중적분포,위지방성음다형불중독방치제공의거。방법2010년,안조《전국음다형지방성불중독류행현상조사방안》요구,재청해성유음전다습관적28개현,선택점전성총인구수99.59%적6개민족진행불중독조사。매개현추사3개향화1개진(목구、농업구、반농반목구、성진),매개향(성진)추취2개행정촌(거위회),매개행정촌(거위회)추사50명성인조사일음다수량급일섭불량。대성인진행불반아、불골증급뇨불검사。매개촌(거위회)채집다수양5~6빈,용우다불측정。불반아진단채용Deans법,다불、뇨불검측채용불리자선택전겁법,성인림상불골증진단삼조《지방성불골증진단표준》(WS 192-2008)。결과공조사10335인,기중장족4972인,한족3063인,회족1196인,몽고족634인,토족235인,살랍족235인;인균일음다수량몽고족위2.53 L,장족위2.19 L,회족위1.74 L,토족위1.63 L,한족위1.22 L,살랍족위1.07 L;일인균섭불량장족위3.99 mg,몽고족위2.78 mg、토족위2.27 mg,회족위2.16 mg,한족위1.78 mg,살랍족위1.28 mg;뇨불중위수장족위1.46 mg/L,토족위1.19 mg/L,회족위1.12 mg/L,한족위0.98 mg/L,몽고족위0.93 mg/L,살랍족위0.81 mg/L。불반아검출솔회족위34.53%(413/1196),한족위27.07%(829/3063),장족위21.60%(1074/4972),토족위20.00%(47/235),몽고족위17.98%(114/634),살랍족위6.38%(15/235)。불골증검출솔장족위13.42%(667/4972)、몽고족위11.04%(70/634)、한족위9.31%(285/3063),회족위7.61%(91/1196),토족위5.53%(13/235),살랍족위4.26%(10/235)。결론음다형불중독재청해성6개민족인군중분포불동,병정류행정황경중불동,장족화몽고족시청해성금후지방성음다형불중독방치적중점인군。
Objective To find out the distribution of drinking-tea-borne fluorosis in the six ethnics in Qinghai Province, and to provide basic data for prevention and control of the disease. Methods In 2010, according to the requirement of “The National Surveillance Program of Drinking-Tea-borne Fluorosis”, six ethnics accounted for 99.59% of total population in Qinghai Province were investigated in 28 counties having brick-tea drinking habit. Three townships and a town in each county, two administrative villages(residents’ committee) in each township and town were chosen and 50 adults in each administrative village and residents ’ committee were selected to check skeletal fluorosis, dental fluorosis, urine fluoride and daily drinking amount of tea water. Five to six samples of drinking tea water were determined. Dental fluorosis was examined by Deans method; the fluoride content of brick-tea and urine were determined by fluoride ion selective electrode; the skeletal fluorosis was diagnosed based on “Endemic Osteofluorosis Clinical Indexing Diagnosis Standard”( WS 192-2008 ) . Results A total of 10 335 adults were surveyed, the number of Tibetan, Han, Hui, Mongolian, Tu and Salar ethnics were 4 972, 3 063, 1 196, 634, 235 and 235, respectively. The daily drinking amounts of tea water in Mongolian, Tibetan, Hui, Tu, Han and Salar ethnics were 2.53, 2.19, 1.74, 1.63, 1.22 and 1.07 L, respectively. Daily fluoride intakes in Tibetan, Mongolian, Tu, Hui, Han and Salar ethnics were 3.99, 2.78,2.27, 2.16, 1.78 and 1.28 mg, respectively. The medians of urinary fluoride concentration of the Tibetan, Tu, Hui, Han, Mongolian and Salar ethnics were 1.46, 1.19, 1.12, 0.98, 0.93 and 0.81 mg/L, respectively. The prevalence rates of dental fluorosis of the Hui, Han, Tibetan, Tu, Mongolian and Salar ethnics were 34.53%(413/1 196), 27.07%(829/3 063), 21.60%(1 074/4 972), 20.00%(47/235), 17.98%(114/634) and 6.38%(15/235), respectively. The incidence rates of clinical skeletal fluorosis of the Tibetan, Mongolian, Han, Hui, Tu and Salar ethnics were 13.42%(667/4 972), 11.04%(70/634), 9.31%(285/3 063), 7.61%(91/1 196), 5.53%(13/235) and 4.26%(10/235), respectively. Conclusions The distribution and prevalent status of drinking-tea-borne fluorosis in the six ethnics of Qinghai Province are different. Tibetan and Mongolian ethnics are the key population concerning the prevention and control of the disease.