实用口腔医学杂志
實用口腔醫學雜誌
실용구강의학잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL STOMATOLOGY
2014年
4期
543-546
,共4页
OGS 指数%第一磨牙%拔牙方式
OGS 指數%第一磨牙%拔牙方式
OGS 지수%제일마아%발아방식
OGS index%The first molar%Extraction pattern
目的:评价拔除下颌第一磨牙治疗错!畸形的疗效。方法:根据拔牙方式将77例错!畸形患者分为常规拔除第一前磨牙组30例、单侧拔除第一磨牙组27例和双侧拔除第一磨牙组20例;测量矫治前后OGS各指数变化情况并进行统计学分析。结果:3组正畸治疗后牙!均有显著的改善(P<0.01),但3组的改变量无明显差异(P>0.05);3组正畸后OGS指数有显著差异(P<0.05),双侧拔除第一前磨牙组优于双侧拔除第一磨牙组(P<0.01),双侧拔除第一磨牙组优于单侧拔除第一磨牙组(P<0.01)。结论:拔除第一磨牙矫治能取得较好的矫治效果,但拔除第一前磨牙在后牙!的矫治中效果更好。
目的:評價拔除下頜第一磨牙治療錯!畸形的療效。方法:根據拔牙方式將77例錯!畸形患者分為常規拔除第一前磨牙組30例、單側拔除第一磨牙組27例和雙側拔除第一磨牙組20例;測量矯治前後OGS各指數變化情況併進行統計學分析。結果:3組正畸治療後牙!均有顯著的改善(P<0.01),但3組的改變量無明顯差異(P>0.05);3組正畸後OGS指數有顯著差異(P<0.05),雙側拔除第一前磨牙組優于雙側拔除第一磨牙組(P<0.01),雙側拔除第一磨牙組優于單側拔除第一磨牙組(P<0.01)。結論:拔除第一磨牙矯治能取得較好的矯治效果,但拔除第一前磨牙在後牙!的矯治中效果更好。
목적:평개발제하합제일마아치료착!기형적료효。방법:근거발아방식장77례착!기형환자분위상규발제제일전마아조30례、단측발제제일마아조27례화쌍측발제제일마아조20례;측량교치전후OGS각지수변화정황병진행통계학분석。결과:3조정기치료후아!균유현저적개선(P<0.01),단3조적개변량무명현차이(P>0.05);3조정기후OGS지수유현저차이(P<0.05),쌍측발제제일전마아조우우쌍측발제제일마아조(P<0.01),쌍측발제제일마아조우우단측발제제일마아조(P<0.01)。결론:발제제일마아교치능취득교호적교치효과,단발제제일전마아재후아!적교치중효과경호。
Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effects of orthodontic therapy with mandibular first molar extraction.Methods:77 cases of malocclusion were divided into 3 groups:Bilateral mandibular first premolar extraction group(A,30 cases),unilateral man-dibular first molar extraction group(B,27cases)and bilateral mandibular first molar extraction group(C,20 cases).The OGS indexes were measured before and after orthodontic treatment and statistically analysed.Results:Remarkable occlusal improvement was seen in all three groups after treatment(P<0.01 ),but the variation of OGS indexes had no significant difference among the 3 groups(P>0.05).OGS indexes among the three groups after treatment were significantly different(P<0.05).The improvement in group A was more significant than that in group C(P<0.01)and the improvement in group C was more significant than that in group B(P<0.01). Conclusion:Orthodontic therapy with bilateral mandibular first molar extraction is effective in orthodontic treatment of malocclusion, but is not as effective as that with bilateral mandibular first premolar extraction.