临床肺科杂志
臨床肺科雜誌
림상폐과잡지
JOUNAL OF CLINICAL PULMONARY MEDICINE
2014年
9期
1632-1634
,共3页
徐健%赵秋良%何灿明%刘龙群%虞嘉康%何泽燕%姜艳平%胡位
徐健%趙鞦良%何燦明%劉龍群%虞嘉康%何澤燕%薑豔平%鬍位
서건%조추량%하찬명%류룡군%우가강%하택연%강염평%호위
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%稳定期%舒利迭%思力华
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%穩定期%舒利迭%思力華
만성조새성폐질병%은정기%서리질%사력화
COPD%stable phases%seretide%spiriva
目的:探讨舒利迭联合思力华治疗COPD的临床疗效。方法96例患者随机分为对照组46例和治疗组50例。对照组给予舒利迭500/50μg,2次/d,治疗组在对照组基础上给予思力华18μg,1次/d,治疗3月。统计疗效,于治疗前后分别行CAT评分,测定肺功能FEV1、FEV1/FVC(%)、血气分析、6 min步行距离。结果治疗组治疗的总有效率达96.0%,明显优于对照组(χ2=7.033,P<0.05);经治疗后CAT评分两组患者均有显著下降(P<0.01,P<0.01),治疗组CAT评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者肺功能均有改善(P<0.05,P<0.01),治疗组肺功能改善高于对照组(P<0.05);血气指标中PCO2和PaO2治疗组较对照组改善更明显(P<0.05);6 min步行距离治疗组明显增加(P<0.01)。结论舒利迭与思力华联合使用治疗COPD稳定期可明显改善症状、肺功能,疗效显著。
目的:探討舒利迭聯閤思力華治療COPD的臨床療效。方法96例患者隨機分為對照組46例和治療組50例。對照組給予舒利迭500/50μg,2次/d,治療組在對照組基礎上給予思力華18μg,1次/d,治療3月。統計療效,于治療前後分彆行CAT評分,測定肺功能FEV1、FEV1/FVC(%)、血氣分析、6 min步行距離。結果治療組治療的總有效率達96.0%,明顯優于對照組(χ2=7.033,P<0.05);經治療後CAT評分兩組患者均有顯著下降(P<0.01,P<0.01),治療組CAT評分明顯低于對照組(P<0.05);兩組患者肺功能均有改善(P<0.05,P<0.01),治療組肺功能改善高于對照組(P<0.05);血氣指標中PCO2和PaO2治療組較對照組改善更明顯(P<0.05);6 min步行距離治療組明顯增加(P<0.01)。結論舒利迭與思力華聯閤使用治療COPD穩定期可明顯改善癥狀、肺功能,療效顯著。
목적:탐토서리질연합사력화치료COPD적림상료효。방법96례환자수궤분위대조조46례화치료조50례。대조조급여서리질500/50μg,2차/d,치료조재대조조기출상급여사력화18μg,1차/d,치료3월。통계료효,우치료전후분별행CAT평분,측정폐공능FEV1、FEV1/FVC(%)、혈기분석、6 min보행거리。결과치료조치료적총유효솔체96.0%,명현우우대조조(χ2=7.033,P<0.05);경치료후CAT평분량조환자균유현저하강(P<0.01,P<0.01),치료조CAT평분명현저우대조조(P<0.05);량조환자폐공능균유개선(P<0.05,P<0.01),치료조폐공능개선고우대조조(P<0.05);혈기지표중PCO2화PaO2치료조교대조조개선경명현(P<0.05);6 min보행거리치료조명현증가(P<0.01)。결론서리질여사력화연합사용치료COPD은정기가명현개선증상、폐공능,료효현저。
Objective To observe the effect of seretide and spiriva in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD) . Methods 96 patients were randomly divided into the treatment group with 50 cases and the control group with 46 cases. Both groups were given conventional therapy. The control group was given seretide twice a day, and the treatment group was given seretide twice a day and spiriva once a day. The two groups were treated for 3 months. The score of CAT, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC (%) , PaCO2 , PaO2 and 6-min walk distance of the two groups were detected before and after the treatment. Results The total effective rate of the treatment group was 96%, which was higher than that in the control group (χ2 =7. 033, P<0. 05). The score of CAT of the two groups significantly improve after treatment (P<0. 01), but the improvement was more pronounced in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0. 05). Compared with the control group after treatment, lung function of the treatment group increased significantly (P<0. 05), 6-min walk distance increased significantly (P<0. 01), and PaCO2 and PaO2 of arterial blood improve significantly ( P<0. 05 ) . Conclusion Serefide and spiriva can improve clinical symptoms and lung function of patients with COPD obviously.