华南农业大学学报
華南農業大學學報
화남농업대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTH CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY
2013年
4期
445-449
,共5页
王云贺%王志春%杨帆%梁正伟%安丰华
王雲賀%王誌春%楊帆%樑正偉%安豐華
왕운하%왕지춘%양범%량정위%안봉화
脱硫石膏%农家肥%水稻生长%碱化度%土壤改良
脫硫石膏%農傢肥%水稻生長%堿化度%土壤改良
탈류석고%농가비%수도생장%감화도%토양개량
desulfurization gypsum%farm manure%rice growth%alkalinity%soil amelioration
针对吉林省西部新垦水田地盐碱化严重等问题,研究了脱硫石膏( GR)、沙土( SS)、农家肥( FM)、混合( M)4种处理对苏打碱土新垦水田的改良作用.结果表明:M处理的水稻株高与SS、FM、对照( CK)间存在极显著差异(P<0.01);GR处理的水稻根长、叶面积指数与CK、FM存在极显著差异(P<0.01);M和GR处理水稻株高、根长和叶面积指数差异不显著,表明M处理中的脱硫石膏成分对土壤改良的贡献率最大,进而影响水稻的形态特征.M处理的水稻根生物量最高,GR处理的水稻茎、叶、穗生物量和总生物量最高,并且与CK间存在极显著差异( P<0.01).在改良12个月后,0~20 cm土层土壤的pH在M与CK间存在显著差异(P<0.05);CK、SS与GR处理间EC值差异极显著(P<0.01).在改良17个月后,M与CK间土壤pH存在极显著差异(P<0.01);CK、FM和SS处理与GR、M处理间EC、ESP值存在极显著差异(P<0.01),M处理的EC值最高、ESP最低.GR处理水稻产量达到6071 kg/hm2.
針對吉林省西部新墾水田地鹽堿化嚴重等問題,研究瞭脫硫石膏( GR)、沙土( SS)、農傢肥( FM)、混閤( M)4種處理對囌打堿土新墾水田的改良作用.結果錶明:M處理的水稻株高與SS、FM、對照( CK)間存在極顯著差異(P<0.01);GR處理的水稻根長、葉麵積指數與CK、FM存在極顯著差異(P<0.01);M和GR處理水稻株高、根長和葉麵積指數差異不顯著,錶明M處理中的脫硫石膏成分對土壤改良的貢獻率最大,進而影響水稻的形態特徵.M處理的水稻根生物量最高,GR處理的水稻莖、葉、穗生物量和總生物量最高,併且與CK間存在極顯著差異( P<0.01).在改良12箇月後,0~20 cm土層土壤的pH在M與CK間存在顯著差異(P<0.05);CK、SS與GR處理間EC值差異極顯著(P<0.01).在改良17箇月後,M與CK間土壤pH存在極顯著差異(P<0.01);CK、FM和SS處理與GR、M處理間EC、ESP值存在極顯著差異(P<0.01),M處理的EC值最高、ESP最低.GR處理水稻產量達到6071 kg/hm2.
침대길림성서부신은수전지염감화엄중등문제,연구료탈류석고( GR)、사토( SS)、농가비( FM)、혼합( M)4충처리대소타감토신은수전적개량작용.결과표명:M처리적수도주고여SS、FM、대조( CK)간존재겁현저차이(P<0.01);GR처리적수도근장、협면적지수여CK、FM존재겁현저차이(P<0.01);M화GR처리수도주고、근장화협면적지수차이불현저,표명M처리중적탈류석고성분대토양개량적공헌솔최대,진이영향수도적형태특정.M처리적수도근생물량최고,GR처리적수도경、협、수생물량화총생물량최고,병차여CK간존재겁현저차이( P<0.01).재개량12개월후,0~20 cm토층토양적pH재M여CK간존재현저차이(P<0.05);CK、SS여GR처리간EC치차이겁현저(P<0.01).재개량17개월후,M여CK간토양pH존재겁현저차이(P<0.01);CK、FM화SS처리여GR、M처리간EC、ESP치존재겁현저차이(P<0.01),M처리적EC치최고、ESP최저.GR처리수도산량체도6071 kg/hm2.
Effects of different treatments ( desulfurization gypsum ( GR ) , sandy soil ( SS ) , farm manure (FM) and mixed(M)) on new reclamation paddy field amelioration of soda alkaline soil were studied for these serious problems of soil salinization .The results showed that the rice height in M treatment differed significantly from SS, FM and control (CK) treatments (P<0.01);the root length and leaf area index in GR treatment differed significantly from control and FM treatments , the rice height , root length and leaf area index in M treatment did not have significant differences from GR treatment , which indicated that GR had the largest contribution to soil amelioration and affected morphological characteristics of rice . The root biomass of M treatment was the maximum , and the stem, leaf, spike and total biomass of GR treatment were the maximum , which differed significantly from CK .Soil pH of 0-20 cm in M treatment differed from CK ( P<0.05 ); differences in electric conductivity ( EC ) among CK , SS and GR treat-ments were statistically significant ( P<0.01) after amelioration of 12 months, but the soil pH in M treatment differed significantly from CK (P<0.01), the maximum EC and minimum exchangeable sodi-um percentage ( ESP) were observed in M treatment;the EC and ESP of CK , FM and SS treatments dif-fered from GR and M treatments after amelioration of 17 months.The rice yield was 6 071 kg/hm2 in GR treatment .The most economic way was GR treatment in terms of cost savings , amelioration and produc-tion increase .