中国肿瘤临床
中國腫瘤臨床
중국종류림상
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2014年
15期
975-978
,共4页
俞新华%汪福康%宋敏%冯惠勇%王簕%张志
俞新華%汪福康%宋敏%馮惠勇%王簕%張誌
유신화%왕복강%송민%풍혜용%왕륵%장지
辐射剂量%肺癌%体层摄影术%X线计算机
輻射劑量%肺癌%體層攝影術%X線計算機
복사제량%폐암%체층섭영술%X선계산궤
radiation dose%lung cancer%tomography%X-ray machine
目的:通过常规CT和低剂量CT的对比研究,探讨低剂量CT在肺癌术后短期复查中的应用价值。方法:83例肺癌术后短期内复查CT的患者,50例(A组)行常规CT扫描,33例(B组)行低剂量CT扫描。分别从图像质量和临床需求角度出发对所有CT图像进行评分,并记录每个病例的辐射剂量指标CTDIvol、DLP。比较二组之间的评分和辐射剂量是否存在显著性差异。结果:二组在图像质量方面的平均得分分别为3.705±0.314、3.311±0.442,在临床需求方面的平均得分为2.670±0.373、2.561±0.410, CTDIvol分别为(19.248±1.532)mGy、(10.138±1.113)mGy,DLP分别为(170.180±19.259)mGy*cm、(99.061±14.504)mGy*cm。二组在图像质量、CTDIvol、DLP方面均存在显著性差异,在临床需求评分方面无显著性差异。结论:低剂量CT完全能满足临床对于肺癌术后短期复查的需求,并明显降低了辐射剂量。
目的:通過常規CT和低劑量CT的對比研究,探討低劑量CT在肺癌術後短期複查中的應用價值。方法:83例肺癌術後短期內複查CT的患者,50例(A組)行常規CT掃描,33例(B組)行低劑量CT掃描。分彆從圖像質量和臨床需求角度齣髮對所有CT圖像進行評分,併記錄每箇病例的輻射劑量指標CTDIvol、DLP。比較二組之間的評分和輻射劑量是否存在顯著性差異。結果:二組在圖像質量方麵的平均得分分彆為3.705±0.314、3.311±0.442,在臨床需求方麵的平均得分為2.670±0.373、2.561±0.410, CTDIvol分彆為(19.248±1.532)mGy、(10.138±1.113)mGy,DLP分彆為(170.180±19.259)mGy*cm、(99.061±14.504)mGy*cm。二組在圖像質量、CTDIvol、DLP方麵均存在顯著性差異,在臨床需求評分方麵無顯著性差異。結論:低劑量CT完全能滿足臨床對于肺癌術後短期複查的需求,併明顯降低瞭輻射劑量。
목적:통과상규CT화저제량CT적대비연구,탐토저제량CT재폐암술후단기복사중적응용개치。방법:83례폐암술후단기내복사CT적환자,50례(A조)행상규CT소묘,33례(B조)행저제량CT소묘。분별종도상질량화림상수구각도출발대소유CT도상진행평분,병기록매개병례적복사제량지표CTDIvol、DLP。비교이조지간적평분화복사제량시부존재현저성차이。결과:이조재도상질량방면적평균득분분별위3.705±0.314、3.311±0.442,재림상수구방면적평균득분위2.670±0.373、2.561±0.410, CTDIvol분별위(19.248±1.532)mGy、(10.138±1.113)mGy,DLP분별위(170.180±19.259)mGy*cm、(99.061±14.504)mGy*cm。이조재도상질량、CTDIvol、DLP방면균존재현저성차이,재림상수구평분방면무현저성차이。결론:저제량CT완전능만족림상대우폐암술후단기복사적수구,병명현강저료복사제량。
To explore the application value of low-dose CT in lung cancer after operation in a short-term review by comparing conventional and low-dose CT. Methods:In 83 cases of lung cancer during the immediate postoperative period review, 50 cases (group A) underwent conventional CT scanning, whereas 33 cases (group B) underwent low-dose CT scanning. All CT scans were scored on the basis of image quality and clinical needs. The radiation dose indexes CTDIvol and DLP were recorded for each case. A comparison of the score and radiation dose between the two groups helped determine the existence of significant differences. Results:The average image quality scores of the two groups were 3.705±0.314 and 3.311±0.442, those for clinical demand were 2.670±0.373 and 2.561±0.410, those for CTDIvol were (19.248±1.532) mGy and (10.138±1.113) mGy, and those for DLP were (170.180±19.259) mGy*cm and (99.061±14.504) mGy*cm. The two groups exhibited significant differences in image quality, CTDIvol, and DLP but revealed no significant dissimilarity in clinical demand. Conclusion:Low-dose CT completely meets the clinical requirements for short-term follow-up after resection of lung cancer and significant reduction in radiation dose.